2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation of group I p21-activated kinases in neuroplasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4B(iii),C]. Expression of PAK1, the downstream effector for both Rac1 and Cdc42 (Koth et al, 2014; Zhao et al, 2006) and upstream regulator of stathmin1, was reduced in scenario A 1.73-fold ( n =3) but increased in scenario B 1.37-fold ( n =3) [Fig. 4B(iv),C].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4B(iii),C]. Expression of PAK1, the downstream effector for both Rac1 and Cdc42 (Koth et al, 2014; Zhao et al, 2006) and upstream regulator of stathmin1, was reduced in scenario A 1.73-fold ( n =3) but increased in scenario B 1.37-fold ( n =3) [Fig. 4B(iv),C].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2G and H). Another downstream target of RhoA is p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1), which, when activated, is neuroprotective and involved in regulating the actin cytoskeleton and neuroplasticity, including LTP consolidation, and increased post-synaptic density (PSD) levels (57–59). R6/2 mice given vehicle had reduced pPAK1 and PSD-95 levels which were normalized by LM11A-31 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RhoA-Rho kinase (ROCK) activity 15,16 and Ca 2þ influx 17,18 have been reported to play a role in regulating axonal retraction by rod photoreceptors in both isolated tiger salamander rod cells and detached porcine retinas. This study expands these findings by examining (1) the role of ROCK's downstream effector, LIM kinase (LIMK) [19][20][21] ; (2) the role of p21-activated kinase (Pak), like ROCK, an upstream regulator of LIMK [21][22][23][24] ; and (3) the relationship between Ca 2þ influx and ROCK or LIMK in rod cell injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%