Participation Of Smallholder Farmers In Agro-processing Industries: Implications For The Extension Services Of Gauteng Province

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the levels of participation of smallholder farmers in the agroprocessing industries of Gauteng Province. The main objective was to determine the implications of participation or lack thereof for the extension services, using an exploratory mixed sequential design. Four focus group sessions were conducted to account for qualitative data collection, and the survey data was gathered from three regions of Gauteng Province (West Rand, Pretoria, and Germiston). A sample of smallholder farmers (n=78) was purposively selected across the three regions to select participants. The results revealed that factors such as institutional design, condition of participation, and collaboration were critical in influencing these farmers. However, the results also revealed that leadership did not affect either of the levels of participation of these farmers. Therefore, these results suggest that the level of participation in smallholder farming could be improved, should the influential factors be taken into consideration during the development planning of these farmers. It is recommended that strategic plans formulated by the supporting institutions consider these influential factors as the tools for the transformation of the agro-processing industries. These factors could stimulate participation by smallholder farmers in this sector.

Beyond Least Squares Assumptions: Quantile Regression Estimates of the Heterogeneity in Commercialization–The Case of Sunflower-Producing Households in North West Province, South Africa

“…Other previous studies conducted in SSA and elsewhere indicate that agricultural commercialization increases household incomes and promotes rural development, combating food insecurity (Lifeyo, 2017;Kyaw et al, 2018). Compelling evidence from other high-quality literature (Pender and Dawit, 2007;Barrett, 2008;Sigei, 2014;Muricho et al, 2015;Mmbengwa et al, 2018) has also established the empirical regularity that achieving increased income, food security, farm productivity, and high standards of living is positively and strongly associated with commercialization. In a plurality of context, higher income resulting from commercialization stimulated increased households' dietary diversity and better nutrition security.…”

Does agro-processing adoption affect farm income and farm diversification? Empirical evidence from Taiwan

“…Furthermore, while market access can also be the main concern in participating in agro-processing, the CoA also established the Agricultural Product Processing Integration Service Center to evaluate potential markets for processed products and provide advisory to farm households. (CoA, 2019b;CoA, 2020;Mmbengwa et al, 2018).…”

Factors influencing value-addition agricultural choice within smallholder farming agribusinesses of Gauteng Province in South Africa

“…Rural Dev., 2(60), 183-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.17306/ J.JARD.2021.01374 www.jard.edu.pl new approaches to improve their businesses. Mmbengwa (2018) pointed out that male farmers believe that access to infrastructure can improve value addition, while female farmers believe the development of value chains and market access are significant in improving value addition. Akudugu et al (2012) and Abdulai and Huffman (2014) revealed dynamics of land size, showing that larger farm sizes are likely to influence the adoption of modern inputs.…”