“…The critical appraisal demonstrated that some of the studies using quantitative methods did not have a representative sample of participants (Effendy, Vernooij‐Dassen et al., ; Eriksson & Lauri, ), the patients were not at similar point in the stage of their illness (Effendy, Vernooij‐Dassen et al., ; Effendy, Vissers et al., ), the confounding factors were not identified in the study (Kuuppelomäki, ; Zhang et al., ), and the outcomes of the study were not assessed using objective criteria (Effendy, Vernooij‐Dassen et al., ; Effendy, Vissers et al., ; Kuuppelomäki, ; Pardon et al., ; Zhang et al., ). In most of the qualitative studies evaluated, the philosophical perspective was not stated (Andershed & Ternestedt, ; Da Silva & da Silva Lima, ) and the influence of the researcher on the research was not addressed (Andershed & Ternestedt, ; Da Silva & da Silva Lima, ; Ekstedt et al., ).…”