Participatory Assessment of Multi Risks in Urban Regions—The Case of Critical Infrastructures in Metropolitan Lima

Greiving, Stefan; Fleischhauer, Mark; León, Christian; Schödl, Leonie; Wachinger, Gisela; Miralles, Iris Katherine Quintana; Larraín, Benjamín Prado

doi:10.3390/su13052813

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to a technical description, ongoing public and expert participation has proven to improve public and expert support for big infrastructure projects [27]. Due to the dependencies of CI sectors, methods have been developed for CI operator engagement [28][29][30]. One approach used as a reference for this work is the CIrcle (Critical Infrastructure: Relations and Consequences for Life and Environment) approach, which consists of preparing and executing a workshop in three major steps [31]: 1. stakeholder identification and involvement; 2. participatory assembly of CI network for the current risk status and future scenarios; 3. development of mitigation measures.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating Critical Infrastructure Networks into Flood Risk Management

Schotten

Bachmann

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Critical infrastructure (CI) networks are essential for the survival and functionality of society and the economy. Disruptions to CI services and the cascading effects of these disruptions are not currently included in flood risk management (FRM). The work presented in this study integrates CI into every step of FRM, including flood risk analysis, risk mitigation and risk communication. A CI network modelling technique enables the flood consequences for CI to be quantified as part of the flood risk analysis. The CI consequences derived from this analysis include spatial overviews and the temporal succession of CI disruptions. The number of affected CI end-users and the duration of the disruption are arranged in a risk matrix and in a decision-making matrix. Thus, the total flood risk is extended with CI consequences. By integrating CI and CI network characteristics into the flood risk assessment and the mitigation steps, a wider range of measures for action can be considered. Additionally, the continuous participation of CI operators is introduced as beneficial for every step of the FRM. A case study in Accra, Ghana proves the benefits of CI integration for all FRM steps. During participatory CI stakeholder engagements for this study six CI sectors were identified for the assembly of the CI network. The backbone of the analysis is a multisectoral, layered CI network model with 433 point elements, 1216 connector elements and 486 polygon elements.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data quality significantly impacts the CI network model's level of granularity and fidelity. Examples have shown how this information is derived in a participatory workshop setting [28,55] or through empirical sources [56,57].…”

Section: Elementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Critical Infrastructure Networks into Flood Risk Management

Schotten

Bachmann

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Přibyl et al [21] present a decision support system for tunnel managers designed to preserve or even increase tunnel safety using the CAPITA method. Furthermore, Greiving et al [22] through a case study in Lima (Peru), developed a multi-risk approach to identify CIs in urban areas. The main results demonstrate that the electricity sector is the sector with the highest systemic criticality, followed by IT and emergency response.…”

Section: Cluster#1 "Risk Assessment" (39 Documents)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Infrastructures Overview: Past, Present and Future

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industrialized societies depend on the proper functioning of a whole range of technological infrastructures, such as electricity, road and railway networks and telecommunications which, due to their importance, are generically referred to as critical infrastructures (CIs). Technical failures, natural disasters and malicious events, if not terrorist, could have devastating effects on these infrastructures. The events of the last few years have accelerated efforts to identify and designate CIs at national and European levels and have reinforced concerns about increasing their protection in sensitive sectors for the safety of the individual and the community. The aim of this research is to provide the basic elements to understand the issue along with the reasons for its importance both at national, European and international level. In particular, after analyzing the origin of the problem, a systematic literature review is carried out to study the current research around future perspectives relating to the management of Cis, with particular focus on three research questions: RQ1 “What types of risk assessment methods are used to manage CIs?”, RQ2 “What are the environmental risk mitigation strategies for CIs?” and RQ3 “What is the role of the human factor in the prevention of risks for CIs?”. The results aim to be guidelines for decision makers and researchers interested in this topic.

show abstract

“…Critical infrastructures (CIs) are essential for the function of human societies and provision of vital societal services [1][2][3][4]. CIs consist of various components and physical or virtual goods, including electric power, water supply, wastewater, telecommunication, and transportation (e.g., rail, roads, bridges, highways, road tunnels, ports, waterways, and pipelines) [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience Assessment Frameworks of Critical Infrastructures: State-of-the-Art Review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the past two decades, critical infrastructures (CIs) faced a growing number of challenges worldwide due to natural disasters and other disruptive events. To respond to and handle these disasters and disruptive events, the concept of resilience was introduced to CIs. Particularly, many institutions and scholars developed various types of frameworks to assess and enhance CI resilience. The purpose of this paper is to review the resilience assessment frameworks of the CIs proposed by quality papers published in the past decade, determine and analyze the common dimensions and the key indicators of resilience assessment frameworks of CIs, and propose possible opportunities for future research. To achieve these goals, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, which identified 24 resilience assessment frameworks from 24 quality papers. This paper contributes to the current body of resilience research by identifying the common dimensions and the key indicators of the resilience assessment frameworks proposed for CIs. In addition, this paper is beneficial to the practice, because it provides a comprehensive view of the resilience assessment frameworks of CIs from the perspective of implementation, and the indicators are pragmatic and actionable in practice.

show abstract

Participatory Assessment of Multi Risks in Urban Regions—The Case of Critical Infrastructures in Metropolitan Lima

Cited by 10 publications

References 34 publications

Integrating Critical Infrastructure Networks into Flood Risk Management

Integrating Critical Infrastructure Networks into Flood Risk Management

Critical Infrastructures Overview: Past, Present and Future

Resilience Assessment Frameworks of Critical Infrastructures: State-of-the-Art Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About