Participatory Checking and the Temporality of Landscapes

Abstract

Developmental narratives are commonly constructed through statements on directions and drivers of ongoing change. In the process, however, heterogeneous realities and historical trajectories become manicured and truncated due to temporal short-sightedness, misinformation, and the creation of clear-cut categorizations. Based on historical, geographical, and anthropological research on landscape change in East Africa from the nineteenth century to the present, this chapter examines how different types of historical data sources (maps, photographs, remote sensing data, written and oral accounts, as well as the landscape itself) can be used to both interrogate and improve the rigour of narratives that frame concerns for development and conservation. We describe methods of interaction with members of the researched communities over these various data bodies, and summarize this process as ‘participatory checking’. While the focus of this chapter is on landscape change the participatory research methods described are equally relevant to other topics and disciplines.

Crop raiding by wild mammals in Ethiopia: impacts on the livelihoods of smallholders in an agriculture–forest mosaic landscape

“…As some of the information shared by informants could be considered sensitive the data were anonymized to avoid exposing participants to risk as a result of sharing their knowledge with us. We reported our findings to farmers and local government offices at various stages of the research via pamphlets in the regional language, Afaan Oromo (Årlin et al, 2015). The distribution of these pamphlets and ensuing discussions facilitated triangulation of information and provided an opportunity to capture updates about trends and patterns in crop raiding after the initial fieldwork.…”

‘There's Nothing Wrong With You; You Just Need to Lose Weight’—A Qualitative Exploration of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Among Women With Multiple Sclerosis and Their Interaction in Seeking Pelvic Healthcare

“…All those who had been a part of the focus group and interviews were invited to a one‐to‐one session with the primary author 6 months after their interview. The goal was to confirm the applicability of the interpreted themes [ 48 ]. In addition to this, the primary author was invited to present the initial findings to an in‐person MS diversity event, attended by 30 people, including people with MS, friends and family.…”

Effective Strategies Small Retail Leaders Use to Engage Employees

“…The interview process involves the researcher acting as the data collection instrument and in safeguarding there is concentration on the research topic (Paradis, O'Brien, Nimmon, Bandiera, Martimianakis, 2016) A researcher ensures reliability and validity of the data collection process using member checking to prevent misinterpretations of the information (Killawi, Heisler, interview transcripts, analytical thoughts, and drafts of the final study with the participants to ensure their input are accurate (Mitchell, Schuster, Smith, Pronovost, & Wu, 2015). Årlin, Börjeson, and Östberg (2015) shared how a researcher uses member checking as a process to test data collection, a validation to the interpretations as an overview of the pros and cons, and as a tool to check preliminary results to increase validity and credibility. Directly following the interview process, I incorporated member checking to confirm the validity of each participant's responses.…”