2011
DOI: 10.9715/kila.2011.39.3.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory Design Process for the Utilization of the Military Relocation Site - The Case of the Idea Competition for the Fukaya Communication Site in Yokohama -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang’s survey-based study of a citywide park policy is a typical effect evaluation; its aim is to evaluate a previously implemented urban park development policy [ 15 ]. Although public engagement efforts about urban planning and related policymaking have mostly focused on effect evaluations [ 15 , 24 , 33 ], a few programs have focused on the design or evaluation of the process [ 21 , 35 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Huang’s survey-based study of a citywide park policy is a typical effect evaluation; its aim is to evaluate a previously implemented urban park development policy [ 15 ]. Although public engagement efforts about urban planning and related policymaking have mostly focused on effect evaluations [ 15 , 24 , 33 ], a few programs have focused on the design or evaluation of the process [ 21 , 35 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative can be found in the Yokohama project, which transformed a former military base into a public park. Its participatory design process focused on communicating and collecting information through five layers of participation: competition, public voting, public promotion, exhibitions and symposiums, and continued information distribution [ 35 ]. Because the Yokohama case required public awareness, its public engagement managers focused on consistency in the distribution of communication.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%