“…This type of approach was in line with case studies and field studies such as observation, documentation and categorization of the phenomena. These data was elicited from interview (Perera et al, 2017;Pollock et al, 2019;Rahman and Kausel, 2012;Drolet et al, 2015;O'Neill et al, 2016), semi-structured interviews (Houston et al, 2019), group interview (Alaedini et al, 2011;Arneson et al, 2017;Comes et al, 2019), in-depth interviews (Gultom and Joyce, 2014;Cretney, 2016), focus group (Golding et al, 2020;Mosley et al, 2012), field work (Murphy et al, 2014), forum design (Wells et al, 2013;Berke et al, 2011;Dufty, 2017), content analysis (Firdhous and Karuratane, 2018;Herath et al, 2020;Hong et al, 2018), participatory action research (Miles, 2018), document analysis (Sulaiman and Fernando, 2019), ethnographic research (McIlvaine-Newsad et al, 2020), constructivist research (Bacud, 2018), meeting through ergonomics framework (da Silva et al, 2015) and critical review of the literature (Satria et al, 2012). A SLR of community disaster resilience One-third of the studies were quantitative.…”