Participatory health research with migrants: Opportunities, challenges, and way forwards

Abstract

Context Migration is one of the most politically pressing issues of the 21st century but migrant health remains an under‐researched area. The International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) working group on migration developed this position statement to address opportunities and challenges in relation to migrant health. It aims to contribute to a shift from a deficit model that sees migrants as passively affected by policies to their reconceptualization as citizens who are engaged in the co‐creation of solutions. Methods This paper examines the opportunities and challenges posed by the use of PHR with migrants. It draws on a broad literature to provide examples of successful PHR with migrants and highlights critical issues for consideration. Findings Successful initiatives illustrate the value of engaging migrants in the definition of the research agenda, the design and implementation of health interventions, the identification of health‐protective factors and the operationalization and validation of indicators to monitor progress. Within increasingly super diverse contexts, fragmented community landscapes that are not necessarily constructed along ethnicity traits, inadequate structures of representation, local tensions and operational barriers can hamper meaningful PHR with migrants. Conclusion For each research context, it is essential to gauge the ‘optimal’ level and type of participation that is more likely to leverage migrants’ empowerment. The development of Monitoring and Evaluation tools and methodological strategies to manage inter‐stakeholder discrepancies and knowledge translation gaps are steps in this direction. Patient or public contribution This paper draws from contributions of migrant populations and other stakeholders to policymaking.

Migrants’ involvement in health policy, service development and research in the WHO European Region: A narrative review of policy and practice

“…Findings about contextual factors constraining or limiting the impact of participatory projects suggest that achieving concrete changes is best understood as a goal rather than a guarantee [136]. At the same time, initiatives are needed to minimise such contextual constraints so that the full potential of participatory approaches may be realised.…”

A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals

“…The model was tested by a sample of CBPR partnerships and participants verified and expanded upon previous concepts ( Belone et al, 2016 ), resulting in an evaluation framework that highlights important influences at different levels of the socio-ecological model (e.g., individual, group, community) and by different actors (e.g., community and university). Important factors include socio-economic, cultural, and historical contexts; community capacity and university readiness; trust; reflection; power relations; and mutual learning ( Roura et al, 2021 ). A study of 294 participatory research projects examined the relationship between contextual and partnership practices and partnership outcomes, identifying specific practices that were associated with project outcomes ( Duran et al, 2019 ).…”

Fostering Collective Approaches in Supporting Perinatal Mental Healthcare Access for Migrant Women: A Participatory Health Research Study

“…This study used a participatory health research (PHR) design in exploring perinatal mental healthcare for migrant women in Ireland, from the perspective of a diverse range of stakeholders. The benefits of incorporating PHR approaches when exploring migrant health through the lens of 'expert by experience' is widely acknowledged [28,29]. Incorporating PHR improves the robustness and appropriateness of research, whilst also ensuring that recommendations meet the needs of service users [30,31].…”