2020
DOI: 10.1080/1389224x.2020.1828113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participatory versus traditional agricultural advisory models for training farmers in conservation agriculture: a comparative analysis from Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One technology that is been promoted through FFS with farmers is sustainable agricultural practices, specifically conservation agriculture (CA). CA is a system of production based on three interrelated agronomic practices namely minimum or no mechanical soil disturbance, permanent soil cover to protect soil and water conservation and diversified crops grown in rotation or association with legume crops (Bourne et al, 2021;Mutyasira et al, 2018). The implementation of CA has generally been based on the argument that the quality of the soil has diminished due to the intensification of agriculture to increase food production in order to feed the growing population (Ngoma et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One technology that is been promoted through FFS with farmers is sustainable agricultural practices, specifically conservation agriculture (CA). CA is a system of production based on three interrelated agronomic practices namely minimum or no mechanical soil disturbance, permanent soil cover to protect soil and water conservation and diversified crops grown in rotation or association with legume crops (Bourne et al, 2021;Mutyasira et al, 2018). The implementation of CA has generally been based on the argument that the quality of the soil has diminished due to the intensification of agriculture to increase food production in order to feed the growing population (Ngoma et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there is an ongoing debate about the benefits of CA for smallholder farmers Mutyasira et al, 2018). On the other hand, there are studies that call into question the benefits, feasibility and relevance of CA from the perspective of farmers (Bourne et al, 2021) as well as studies that highlight the limited uptake of CA by farmers Mutyasira et al, 2018). Despite this, CA is being promoted in various countries using FFS, and its adoption is a high priority on the policy and research agendas in most SSA countries (Mutyasira et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociograms were developed using the R-Studio igraph package (Csardi and Nepusz 2006) and density calculated as the average degree of nodes (the average number of connections per interviewed actor). (Bourne et al 2020). To assess information flow and control in the network, centrality measures were used to determine the potential control of communication by stakeholders in a network (Freeman 1977;…”
Section: Data Collection Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have questioned the effects and applicability of CA to small and resource-poor farmers, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (Bourne et al, 2021). Scheba (2017) has observed decreased yields and increased labour requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%