1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(86)90005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle charge in combustion aerosols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of magnitude decrease in a for Douglas Fir from 3.07 to 0.31 x lo8, accompanying the transition from flaming to non-flaming combustion mode, suggests a large charge fraction in non-flaming wood smoke aerosols. This is supported by the 0.5 to 0.8 equilibrium charge fraction reported for smoke from smoldering wood fires [8] and is compatible with general ionization detector experience showing insensitivity to non-flaming fires such as from wood 191.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The order of magnitude decrease in a for Douglas Fir from 3.07 to 0.31 x lo8, accompanying the transition from flaming to non-flaming combustion mode, suggests a large charge fraction in non-flaming wood smoke aerosols. This is supported by the 0.5 to 0.8 equilibrium charge fraction reported for smoke from smoldering wood fires [8] and is compatible with general ionization detector experience showing insensitivity to non-flaming fires such as from wood 191.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Previous work [8] has measured the fraction of charged particles produced by the combustion of a number of materials, and has shown that particle charge depends strongly on the material burned. For example, flaming wood and heptane were shown to have a charge fraction, X,, of 0.20, while 0.80 was found for flaming polyurethane.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was further noted that Burtscher et al [1] observed a much higher initial fraction (70%) of charged smoke particles for heptane/toluene fires than for smoldering wood fires (10-25%).…”
Section: Summary Of Initial Observations and A Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As part of this investigation it was learned that the Type A detectors used an antistatic ABS for the smoke chamber components whereas the Type B detectors used a non-antistatic ABS. Furthermore, it was learned that Burtscher et al [1] observed a much higher initial fraction (70%) of charged smoke particles for heptane/toluene fires than for smoldering wood fires (10-25%). Based on the results of the experiments and these additional facts, it was determined that the specific cause of the anomalous behavior of the Type B detectors was the use * Correspondence should be addressed to: J. R. Qualey III, E-mail: jrqiii@gis.net 216 Fire Technology 2005 of a non-antistatic material for their smoke chamber components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Soot particles themselves may be originally charged, especially if they are formed through the "ionic route", (Fialkov, 1997) but they may also gain a net charge through ion-attachment. Measurements indicate that in the hottest zone, soot particles may be charged according to equilibrium, (see, for example, Lawton and Weinberg, 1969) but this is not always the case and the initial particle charge seems to depend upon the material burnt (Burtscher et al, 1986). It is interesting to note that the net charge of soot particles in flames was found to be positive (Onischuk et al, 2001) even in the flame region where a large excess of electrons exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%