2000
DOI: 10.2307/3434958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Concentrations in Urban Microenvironments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the PM 2.5 exposure between indoor and outdoor microenvironments, some studies have measured this pollutant simultaneously in both microenvironments (Brauer et al, 2000;Levy et al, 2000;Rojas-Bracho et al, 2000). Since in this work PM 2.5 real-time personal measurements were obtained, measurements at indoor and outdoor microenvironments were not paired by time, and indoor and outdoor measurements were grouped independently of the day time.…”
Section: Study Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to compare the PM 2.5 exposure between indoor and outdoor microenvironments, some studies have measured this pollutant simultaneously in both microenvironments (Brauer et al, 2000;Levy et al, 2000;Rojas-Bracho et al, 2000). Since in this work PM 2.5 real-time personal measurements were obtained, measurements at indoor and outdoor microenvironments were not paired by time, and indoor and outdoor measurements were grouped independently of the day time.…”
Section: Study Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed us to identify the microenvironment without recall bias, although microenvironment classification errors could be introduced by the participants. Other studies assigned activities to the participants into different microenvironments (Levy et al, 2000), or interviewed the study subjects in order to identify the microenvironments in which they stayed during the whole recording period (Brauer et al, 2000). Preassigned activities avoid microenvironment misclassification, but do not allow the assessment of the real exposure during activities on an ordinary day.…”
Section: Study Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dispersion models have also been used to estimate exposure because they incorporate both spatial and temporal variations in pollutant concentration; however, dispersion models require resource-intensive meteorological and emissions data to make accurate predictions (Briggs et al, 1997;Jerrett et al, 2005). Land use regression (LUR) modeling has emerged as a cost-effective alternative approach to meet these challenges of assessing the intra-urban spatial variability of ambient air pollutants in urban and industrial settings because it can capture local-scale spatial variations more effectively and economically than previous monitoring and modeling approaches Levy et al, 2000;Jerrett et al, 2005;Brauer et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal and household-level monitoring provide more accurate measures of exposure (Levy et al, 2000), but the suitability of individual monitoring for estimating exposure in epidemiologic studies is hampered by the high cost and participant burden associated with air monitoring data collection, particularly for a large cohort (Madsen et al, 2007). Dispersion models have also been used to estimate exposure because they incorporate both spatial and temporal variations in pollutant concentration; however, dispersion models require resource-intensive meteorological and emissions data to make accurate predictions (Briggs et al, 1997;Jerrett et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%