1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02672705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle ejection from the shocked free surface of metals and diagnostic methods for these particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreased density of the sample material observed in the X-ray photographs in the regions of convexities ( Fig. 2b and c) is apparently caused by particle ejection (dusting) due to the microcumulation of particles resulting from the presence of the initial microrelief (in the experiments, the surface roughness was R z 20) [3]. Evidence for this is that in the regions located under the initial convexities, the velocity of the FS segments is 3.4 km/sec, i.e., it is somewhat higher than the calculated velocity of the continuous material of 3.2 km/sec under the given loading conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decreased density of the sample material observed in the X-ray photographs in the regions of convexities ( Fig. 2b and c) is apparently caused by particle ejection (dusting) due to the microcumulation of particles resulting from the presence of the initial microrelief (in the experiments, the surface roughness was R z 20) [3]. Evidence for this is that in the regions located under the initial convexities, the velocity of the FS segments is 3.4 km/sec, i.e., it is somewhat higher than the calculated velocity of the continuous material of 3.2 km/sec under the given loading conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Much weaker influence on the calculated jet parameters is exerted by the shear fracture parameters, effective viscosity, and pressure, which determine the rate of pore formation in the presence of tensile stresses. We note that the main parameters of the kinetic fracture model were chosen from a large series of hydrodynamic experiments (see [3,4,9,10], etc.). Figure 4 also gives experimental data obtained by processing X-ray photographs (see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collapse of the contact gap gives rise to three-dimensional flow near the interface, resulting in air entrainment in micropores and viscoplastic heating of the inner pore surface [11]. We also note that interface is heated by deceleration of the microjets [12] spreading form the surface of the upper plate. Near the interface all these mechanisms produce considerable thermal inhomogeneities, whose temperature exceeds the equilibrium temperature of the solid material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong shock wave released from the metalvacuum/gas interface may eject a great number of metal particles. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Most of these particles are of micrometer-scale in size. This phenomenon of ejecta, or microjetting, was first observed by Kormer et al in a plane impact experiment in the 1950s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%