2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle encapsulation techniques for atom probe tomography of precipitates in microalloyed steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Seol et al (2016), the surface modification from the conductive layer coating improves the overall evaporation sequences. Unlike ceramic coating approaches (Sundell et al, 2019;Webel et al, 2021), a high quality data could be acquired here because a fusible alloy has relatively high thermal (0.19 W/cm °C) and electrical conductivity (0.57 nΩ m) which allows to dissipate the energy and electrons quickly to the base of the specimen (Lipchitz et al, 2015). This can explain the high (3:3) success rate of sample preparation in this investigation, with over 10 million ions collected for each specimen, and without premature or microfractures.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Seol et al (2016), the surface modification from the conductive layer coating improves the overall evaporation sequences. Unlike ceramic coating approaches (Sundell et al, 2019;Webel et al, 2021), a high quality data could be acquired here because a fusible alloy has relatively high thermal (0.19 W/cm °C) and electrical conductivity (0.57 nΩ m) which allows to dissipate the energy and electrons quickly to the base of the specimen (Lipchitz et al, 2015). This can explain the high (3:3) success rate of sample preparation in this investigation, with over 10 million ions collected for each specimen, and without premature or microfractures.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent precipitate size and shapes can be affected by the so-called local magnification that is caused by different evaporation field strengths of adjacent phases [38]. The Nb precipitates cause a higher field strength than iron [54] and their shape will be somewhat distorted, but the large difference in precipitate morphology between both steels indicates that rather the particle nucleation and growth is the reason for the morphology differences [26]. The high solution temperature used for Steel Nb, quenching and successive aging at 690 °C caused Nb precipitation from a highly supersaturated ferrite matrix that has a low solubility for Nb.…”
Section: Minimum Detectable Precipitate Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%