2003
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2003.1236770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
375
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 842 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
375
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in very dry climates, the very low SM temporal variability precluded an improvement of the rainfall-runoff simulations when SM was assimilated. Matgen et al [19], in a tiny catchment in Luxembourg, used the Particle Filter [41] for assimilating both in-situ and satellite SM observations into the Bibmodel [42]. They found that, while the assimilation of in-situ data was successful, the use of ASCAT data did not lead to significant advantages and that the assimilation of SM is more efficient for flood forecasting during the transition periods (i.e., spring and fall seasons).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in very dry climates, the very low SM temporal variability precluded an improvement of the rainfall-runoff simulations when SM was assimilated. Matgen et al [19], in a tiny catchment in Luxembourg, used the Particle Filter [41] for assimilating both in-situ and satellite SM observations into the Bibmodel [42]. They found that, while the assimilation of in-situ data was successful, the use of ASCAT data did not lead to significant advantages and that the assimilation of SM is more efficient for flood forecasting during the transition periods (i.e., spring and fall seasons).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the case that a single target appears, with no false alarms, is there no association problem and optimal Bayesian filters can be applied, such as Kalman filters under ideal conditions, or suboptimal Bayesian filters like Multiple Models (IMM) (Yeddanapudi et al 1997) for realistic maneuvering situations and Particle Filters (PF) (Arulampalam et al 2002;Djuric et al 2003) in non-Gaussian conditions.…”
Section: Probabilistic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle filtering algorithm (Djuric et al, 2003) is a sequential Monte Carlo method. The algorithm is powerful in approximating non-Gaussian probability distributions.…”
Section: Particle Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%