2016 American Control Conference (ACC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2016.7525232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle filtering for online motion planning with task specifications

Abstract: A probabilistic framework for online motion planning of vehicles in dynamic environments is proposed. We develop a sampling-based motion planner that incorporates prediction of obstacle motion. A key feature is the introduction of task specifications as artificial measurements. This allows us to cast the exploration phase in the planner as a nonlinear, possibly multimodal, estimation problem, which is effectively solved using particle filtering. For certain parameter choices, the approach is equivalent to solv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of proposed method, it is compared with conventional Kalman filter and Particle filter (Berntorp K., et al, 2016). Fig.…”
Section: Performance Of the Stacked Denoising Autoencoder Based Exten...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of proposed method, it is compared with conventional Kalman filter and Particle filter (Berntorp K., et al, 2016). Fig.…”
Section: Performance Of the Stacked Denoising Autoencoder Based Exten...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deterministic requirements represent goals that a dynamical system aims to satisfy, whereas the probability distribution represents tolerated deviations from the requirements accounting for uncertainties and noise, or that the requirements may not be perfectly achieved. The considered control objective for decision-making has been proposed in [6], [7], where a particle filter extracts the motion plan for autonomous driving from given requirements and their joint probability distribution. This paper considers the inverse problem, where motion plans are generated by a different actor, e.g., a human, who demonstrates how to operate the dynamical system.…”
Section: Key Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, (3) can not be solved a priori. Unlike [19][20][21][22] where y(t) is treated as a random variable, consequently making µ(t|t) itself a random variable, we approximate the optimization problem (3) with an approximate stochastic optimal control problem by using µ(t|0) instead of µ(t|t). Recall that µ(t|0) is computed using only the prediction step of the Kalman filter so that µ(t|0) is equivalent to the unconditional mean µ(t).…”
Section: The Approximate Stochastic Optimal Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [17,18] propose model predictive control frameworks that contain distributionally robust risk constraints that are based on ambiguity sets defined around an empirical state distribution from input-output data. On the other hand, sensor and sampling-based approaches that integrate Kalman or particle filters have been proposed in [19][20][21][22]. These works have in common to treat future output measurements as random variables via its output measurement map, i.e., the map from states to observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%