2017
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/12/12/c12051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle identification algorithms for the PANDA Endcap Disc DIRC

Abstract: The Endcap Disc DIRC has been developed to provide an excellent particle identification for the future PANDA experiment by separating pions and kaons up to a momentum of 4 GeV/c with a separation power of 3 standard deviations in the polar angle region from 5 • to 22 •. This goal will be achieved using dedicated particle identification algorithms based on likelihood methods and will be applied in an offline analysis and online event filtering. This paper evaluates the resulting PID performance using Monte-Carl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The channel number and the beam position are a measure for the polar and azimuthal angle of the Cherenkov photons, respectively. The Endcap Disc DIRC prototype used a synthetic fused silica plate (500 × 500 × 20 mm 3 ) Each measured Cherenkov hit was reconstructed by using a geometrical reconstruction algorithm [20]. The results of the position (Figure 8, left) and angular scans (Figure 8, right) , first published in [6], agree with expectations from GEANT4 simulations.…”
Section: Experiments With Test Beamssupporting
confidence: 64%

The PANDA DIRCs

Schwarz,
Ali,
Belias
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…The channel number and the beam position are a measure for the polar and azimuthal angle of the Cherenkov photons, respectively. The Endcap Disc DIRC prototype used a synthetic fused silica plate (500 × 500 × 20 mm 3 ) Each measured Cherenkov hit was reconstructed by using a geometrical reconstruction algorithm [20]. The results of the position (Figure 8, left) and angular scans (Figure 8, right) , first published in [6], agree with expectations from GEANT4 simulations.…”
Section: Experiments With Test Beamssupporting
confidence: 64%

The PANDA DIRCs

Schwarz,
Ali,
Belias
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…The Monte Carlo data can subsequently be extrapolated from the test beam geometry to the final geometry. A SPR value of 6.06 mrad, measured using a 3 GeV/c electron beam at DESY in 2016, corresponds to a SPR for pions in the full EDD detector of 1.8 mrad at the same momentum [4]. Another approach was taken for the so called combined event analysis, where the data taken during a vertical scan for a single FEL was combined to simulate a prototype equipped with 30 FELs (or 10 ROMs).…”
Section: Prototype Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average 22 photons are detected for each charged particle track. For geometrical reasons the performance depends on the particle track position and ranges between 1.1 and 2.2 mrad at 4 GeV/c which translates into a separation power between 3 and 6 standard deviations [4].…”
Section: Reconstruction and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For optimization purposes, the geometries of both described DIRC detectors have been implemented in a Geant4 framework including all relevant optical and mechanical parameters, such as the efficiencies of the proposed MCP-PMTs, the transmission losses in the radiator material, and the reflectivity of the mirror on the backside of the attached FELs. The reconstruction has been performed using a dedicated algorithm that has already been described in a previous publication [8].…”
Section: Optimization Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%