2002
DOI: 10.1017/s002211200200157x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle image velocimetry investigation of a turbulent boundary layer manipulated by spanwise wall oscillations

Abstract: Particle image velocimetry has been applied to the study of a canonical turbulent boundary layer and to a turbulent boundary layer forced by transversal wall oscillations. This work is part of the research programme at the Politecnico di Torino aerodynamic laboratory with the objective of investigating the response of near-wall turbulence to external perturbations. Results are presented for the optimum oscillation period of 100 viscous time units and for an oscillation amplitude of 320 viscous units. As … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 , Choi et al 4 , Choi 5 , Di Cicca et al 6 and Ricco 7 all show a qualitatively similar response to oscillatory wall motion, downstream of a stretch of around 3-5 boundary-layer thicknesses within which the drag reduces towards its equilibrium level. However, substantial differences in the maximum drag-reduction margins are reported -ranging from 23%, measured by Ricco 7 , up to 45%, obtained by Choi and Graham 8 -and this variability reflects (if experimental errors are presumed modest) significant differences in the wall-velocity amplitude, the Reynolds numbers and also the actuation periods among the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 , Choi et al 4 , Choi 5 , Di Cicca et al 6 and Ricco 7 all show a qualitatively similar response to oscillatory wall motion, downstream of a stretch of around 3-5 boundary-layer thicknesses within which the drag reduces towards its equilibrium level. However, substantial differences in the maximum drag-reduction margins are reported -ranging from 23%, measured by Ricco 7 , up to 45%, obtained by Choi and Graham 8 -and this variability reflects (if experimental errors are presumed modest) significant differences in the wall-velocity amplitude, the Reynolds numbers and also the actuation periods among the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A review of the pertinent literature up to 2012 is included in a recent paper by Touber and Leschziner 2 , and another summarizing work prior to 2003 is given in Karniadakis and Choi 14 . Studies investigating fundamental interactions from a variety of viewpoints -among them Di Cicca et al 6 , Laadhari et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quadrio & Ricco (2004); Ricco & Quadrio (2008); Quadrio et al (2009) ;Touber & Leschziner (2012)) and for spatially evolving boundary layers (e.g. Choi (2002);Di Cicca et al (2002); Ricco (2004); Skote (2013) ;Lardeau & Leschziner (2013)) demonstrate that the imposition of spanwise oscillatory wall motion onto a streamwise turbulent near-wall layer results in a substantial decline in skin friction if the wall-velocity amplitude and oscillation period are chosen judiciously. In the case of streamwise-homogeneous wall motion, the skin friction drops by a maximum of around 35% at the friction Reynolds number Re τ = O(200), a wall-velocity amplitude W m + = W m /u τ = 12 and oscillation period T + = T u 2 τ /ν ≈ 100, but this margin appears to decrease roughly in proportion to Re −0.2 τ , a rate based on simulations by Touber & Leschziner (2012) at Re τ = 500 and 1000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar analysis was also carried out on a set of experimental data [15] for a boundary layer flow. These data are contained in 596 files, each consisting a single window of data including the values of two velocity components in a plane parallel to the wall in a grid of 59 × 59 nodes.…”
Section: Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%