1988
DOI: 10.4139/sfj1950.39.410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle-matrix reactions of electroplated Ni-Al2O3 composite.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the direct formation of crystalline oxide films from aqueous solutions has been demonstrated only on silver oxide, 1 copper oxide 2 by Golden et al, and ZnO by Peulon and Lincot 3,4 and Izaki and Omi. [5][6][7][8] It has been demonstrated by the author that a wurtzite ZnO film with characteristic bandgap energy of 3.3 eV was prepared by a cathodic deposition from a simple zinc nitrate aqueous solution at ambient temperature. [5][6][7][8] A transparent and conductive ZnO film could not be obtained by potentiostatic deposition at a constant potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the direct formation of crystalline oxide films from aqueous solutions has been demonstrated only on silver oxide, 1 copper oxide 2 by Golden et al, and ZnO by Peulon and Lincot 3,4 and Izaki and Omi. [5][6][7][8] It has been demonstrated by the author that a wurtzite ZnO film with characteristic bandgap energy of 3.3 eV was prepared by a cathodic deposition from a simple zinc nitrate aqueous solution at ambient temperature. [5][6][7][8] A transparent and conductive ZnO film could not be obtained by potentiostatic deposition at a constant potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] It has been demonstrated by the author that a wurtzite ZnO film with characteristic bandgap energy of 3.3 eV was prepared by a cathodic deposition from a simple zinc nitrate aqueous solution at ambient temperature. [5][6][7][8] A transparent and conductive ZnO film could not be obtained by potentiostatic deposition at a constant potential. 9 Although a resistivity as low as 4 ϫ 10 Ϫ3 ⍀ cm could be realized at a positive potential, the film showed poor optical transparency in the visible light region because of the large surface irregularity and the existence of pores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%