2022
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle‐resolved turbulent flow in a packed bed: RANS, LES, and DNS simulations

Abstract: Packed bed reactors are widely used to perform solid‐catalyzed gas‐phase reactions and local turbulence is known to influence heat and mass transfer characteristics. We have investigated turbulence characteristics in a packed bed of 113 spherical particles by performing particle‐resolved Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, Large Eddy Simulation (LES), and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). The predictions of the RANS and LES simulations are validated with the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM)–base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the computational cost of LES is lower than that of DNS, LES still requires more computational resources compared to RANS [42][43][44]. Considering the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency of the simulations in this study, the RANS model, which is widely used in engineering, was chosen.…”
Section: Numerical Methodology 221 Governing Equations and Turbulence...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the computational cost of LES is lower than that of DNS, LES still requires more computational resources compared to RANS [42][43][44]. Considering the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency of the simulations in this study, the RANS model, which is widely used in engineering, was chosen.…”
Section: Numerical Methodology 221 Governing Equations and Turbulence...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, the particle-resolved VOF simulations were performed to simulate the gas–liquid (air–water) flow through a small portion of beds using the open-source flow solver OpenFOAM v6. All the simulations were performed at a particle Reynolds number [ Re p = ( ρ l d p V s / μ l , where V s is the superficial liquid velocity (m/s), ρ l and μ l is density (kg/m 3 ) and viscosity of liquid (Pa.s), respectively] of 31 corresponding to the laminar regime . The fluids were considered Newtonian and incompressible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the simulations were performed at a particle Reynolds number [Re p = (ρ l d p V s /μ l , where V s is the superficial liquid velocity (m/s), ρ l and μ l is density (kg/m 3 ) and viscosity of liquid (Pa.s), respectively] of 31 corresponding to the laminar regime. 22 The fluids were considered Newtonian and incompressible. In the VOF method, 23 a single set of continuity (eq 1) and momentum (eq 2) equation was solved…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Although such a mesh can represent the interface accurately, the mesh needs to be extremely fine at the contact point of the solid particles, which leads to high computational costs. 27 To solve these issues at the contact points, different approaches are proposed, for example, shrinking of the particle [28][29][30][31][32] and using a cylindrical bridge between the particles. 30,33 However, these methods change the particle size and thus the porosity of the bed.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%