“…In general, pressure and processing time did not present comprehensible effects and tendencies, contrarily to faster depressurization rates that led to smaller average pore diameters (at all operational conditions and for all tested PCL and PCL/MCM-41 samples -as previously observed by SEM). This is mostly due to the CO 2 diffusion rate in the molten polymer and similar results were already reported in the literature (Collins et al, 2010;Fanovich and Jaeger, 2012;Jenkins et al, 2006;Kiran, 2010;Tai et al, 2007b;Xu et al, 2004;Zhai et al, 2006). In sum, the implemented SFM method enables the preparation of PCL and PCL/MCM-41 composite biomaterials with different morphological properties (density, porosity, surface area, pore volume, average pore diameter and pore diameter range) simply by changing some of the processing conditions (pressure, processing time and depressurization rate, Chen et al, 2002;Tai et al, 2007b;Teng et al, 2007;Rouholamin et al, 2013) and the MCM-41 relative composition.…”