2017
DOI: 10.5194/cp-2017-149
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle shape accounts for instrumental discrepancy in ice core dust size distributions

Abstract: Abstract. The Klotz Abakus laser sensor and the Coulter Counter are both used for measuring the size distribution of insoluble mineral dust particles in ice cores. While the Coulter Counter measures particle volume accurately, the equivalent Abakus instrument measurement deviates substantially from the Coulter Counter depending on the type of sample. We show that the difference between the Abakus and the Coulter Counter measurements is mainly caused by the irregular shape of dust particles in ice core samples.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Coulter counter captures a slightly larger range of particle sizes (0.7 to 20.0 μm) than the Abakus. Another aspect to consider is that ice core dust is generally nonspherical, which affects the Abakus and Coulter counter in different ways (Simonsen et al, ). The insoluble dust mass data from Aarons from Aarons et al (; also determined by Coulter counter) are similarly elevated with respect to the Abakus data, supporting the idea that the discrepancy is due to measurement techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the Coulter counter captures a slightly larger range of particle sizes (0.7 to 20.0 μm) than the Abakus. Another aspect to consider is that ice core dust is generally nonspherical, which affects the Abakus and Coulter counter in different ways (Simonsen et al, ). The insoluble dust mass data from Aarons from Aarons et al (; also determined by Coulter counter) are similarly elevated with respect to the Abakus data, supporting the idea that the discrepancy is due to measurement techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%