2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2014.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle shape characterisation and classification using automated microscopy and shape descriptors in batch manufacture of particulate solids

Abstract: It is known that size alone, as often defined as the volume equivalent diameter, is not sufficient for characterizing many particulate products. The shape of crystalline products can be as important as size in many applications. Traditionally particulate shape is often defined by some simple descriptors such as the maximum length and aspect ratio. Although these descriptors are intuitive, they result in loss of some information of the original shape. This paper presents a method to use principal component anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the application of µ-CT in the geosciences was previously introduced by Ketcham and Carlson (2001) and Ketcham (2005), many investigations that analyze irregular particle shapes are still performed with 2-D approaches (Buller et al, 1990;Zhang et al, 2016;Petrak et al, 2015). So far, µ-CT studies of 3-D features have mostly been related to the characterization of volcanic rocks (Eiríksson et al, 1994;Riley et al, 2003;Shea et al, 2010;Vonlanthen et al, 2015) or spheroidal objects (Robin and Charles, 2015), and these features are usually described by means of equivalent size or shape parameters, such as roundness or aspect ratio (Little et al, 2015;Saraji and Piri, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the application of µ-CT in the geosciences was previously introduced by Ketcham and Carlson (2001) and Ketcham (2005), many investigations that analyze irregular particle shapes are still performed with 2-D approaches (Buller et al, 1990;Zhang et al, 2016;Petrak et al, 2015). So far, µ-CT studies of 3-D features have mostly been related to the characterization of volcanic rocks (Eiríksson et al, 1994;Riley et al, 2003;Shea et al, 2010;Vonlanthen et al, 2015) or spheroidal objects (Robin and Charles, 2015), and these features are usually described by means of equivalent size or shape parameters, such as roundness or aspect ratio (Little et al, 2015;Saraji and Piri, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is being used through a broad range of applications (e.g., image processing, signal analysis, data compression and optimal control [40]), for which the common objective is to extract the dominant features out of a set of data, and to build a reduced model. As shown in [22], this method is also efficient for particle shape classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Such simple descriptors (e.g., elongation or roundness), while providing global shape information, fail to capture the complex morphology of ballast grains (faces,edges, angularity,etc.). More advanced shape descriptors have been introduced in the last years in order to both quantify and represent the realistic geometric characteristics of granular particles before incorporating them in DEM simulations [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signature of a 2D Projection Shape descriptors are often used to capture the shape characteristics of an object, some types have physical meanings such as aspect ratio and roundness, some are latent such as principal component analysis (PCA) based shape descriptors (Zhang and Lu, 2004;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Shape Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%