2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-017-0524-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle shape effect on thermal conductivity and shear wave velocity in sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the observation from the work by Yun and Santamarina (2008) but inconsistent with the observation by Côté and Konrad (2005) who reported that the thermal conductivity of angular particles is higher than that of rounded particles at a given void ratio. Lee et al (2017) reported that the dependence of thermal conductivity on the void ratio for rounded particles is higher than that for angular particles, whereas J. Geotech. Geoenviron.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Shape On Thermal Conductivity-void Ratio mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with the observation from the work by Yun and Santamarina (2008) but inconsistent with the observation by Côté and Konrad (2005) who reported that the thermal conductivity of angular particles is higher than that of rounded particles at a given void ratio. Lee et al (2017) reported that the dependence of thermal conductivity on the void ratio for rounded particles is higher than that for angular particles, whereas J. Geotech. Geoenviron.…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Shape On Thermal Conductivity-void Ratio mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason behind the above differences may be the origin of the data. For example, the data for Yun and Santamarina (2008) include results for six sands tested using the same approach, the data in Côté and Konrad (2005) are from seven published papers, and the data for Lee et al (2017) include results for nine sands tested using the same approach. However, these three studies ignored some important factors between the sands included in the comparison, such as the particle mineralogy, mean particle size, and particle size distribution which can all affect the thermal conductivity of sands to some extent (Aduda 1996;Abuel-Naga and Bouazza 2013;Dong et al 2015;Zhang and Wang 2017;Xiao et al 2018).…”
Section: Effect Of Particle Shape On Thermal Conductivity-void Ratio mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify the particle shape, the shape parameter that is correlated to the thermophysical properties should be identified and evaluated. A recent study on sand investigated the correlation between several quantified shape parameters, such as elongation and sphericity, and geotechnical properties including thermal conductivity of sand specimens [56]. For nanofluids, however, it should be determined whether any of these shape parameters could be correlated to the relative thermal conductivity of the nanofluids.…”
Section: Identifying the Relevant Shape Factor For Thermal Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nanofluids, however, it should be determined whether any of these shape parameters could be correlated to the relative thermal conductivity of the nanofluids. For example, the degree of resemblance of the particle to a sphere is known as sphericity but has different definitions in the literature [39,56,57]. In this study it is defined as the ratio of the diameter of the sphere that has the same surface area or volume as the particle (D eqs or D eqv ) to the diameter of the circumscribing sphere of the nanoparticle (D cs ).…”
Section: Identifying the Relevant Shape Factor For Thermal Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%