1997
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.19970140604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size analysis: A comparison of various methods ii

Abstract: In previous work, the relative performance of various methods used to characterize the particle size distribution of powders composed of fine irregularly shaped particles was assessed. It was found that methods employing Fraunhofer diffraction theory were inferior with respect to particle counting methods. Furthermore, calculated particle size distributions varied considerably between manufactures of Fraunhofer devices. It is well known that the Mie optical model can also be used to analyze the data collected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the above investigation, deviations from sphericity were estimated to overpredict size distribution breadth (determined by comparing the ratio: ([d 90 −d 10 ]/VMD)) by as much as 50% with the nonspherical particles having two-dimensional aspect ratios (A r ) slightly greater than 2.0 (A r =1.0 for a perfect sphere). A similar bias was also observed in another similar study by Etzler and Deanne (55). The underlying Lorenz-Mie-or Fraunhoferbased models associated with commercially available LD both assume that the particles are spherical (41).…”
Section: Laser Diffractometrysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In the above investigation, deviations from sphericity were estimated to overpredict size distribution breadth (determined by comparing the ratio: ([d 90 −d 10 ]/VMD)) by as much as 50% with the nonspherical particles having two-dimensional aspect ratios (A r ) slightly greater than 2.0 (A r =1.0 for a perfect sphere). A similar bias was also observed in another similar study by Etzler and Deanne (55). The underlying Lorenz-Mie-or Fraunhoferbased models associated with commercially available LD both assume that the particles are spherical (41).…”
Section: Laser Diffractometrysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Though LD has shown to be an extremely powerful PSD technique in terms of its universal applicability, broad dynamic size range, (relatively) low required sample amount, user friendliness, and (high) robustness and precision, for years a serious discussion is going on regarding the suggested limited accuracy of this technology [15,16,17]. Indeed, from a measurement point of view, (a) the limited angular resolution of the detectors, (b) the limited angular scattering information and scatter intensity at a smaller particle size, and (c) the orientation of (non-spherical) particles should be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain size mean, mode, sorting, skewness, and kurtosis were calculated using the Fraunhofer optical model (Etzler and Deanne, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%