Particle-Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Flow Resistance of Face Coverings and Common Household Fabrics Used for Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the increase in demand for protective equipment caused a global shortage and homemade barrier face coverings were recommended as alternatives. However, filtration performances of homemade face coverings have not been fully evaluated. Test methods in the ASTM standard (F3502-21) were used to evaluate filtration efficiencies (FE) and breathability (pressure drop, Δp) of face coverings and home fabric materials commonly used during the pandemic. Submicron particulates FE was measured by particle transmission through face covering samples using a Condensation Particle Counter equipped with differential mobility analyzer and electronic manometer. Flow resistance of 0.1 μm-diameter fluorescent nanoparticles in droplets was determined by measuring fluorescence intensity of residual collected at the reverse side of samples. The size-dependent FE (3–94%) and Δ p (0.8–72 mmH 2 O) varied considerably among fabrics. Of the 16 mask types, 31.25% and 81.25% met the minimum FE and breathability standards in the ASTM F3502-21, respectively. Overall performance (qF) was highest for velcro masks (max qF = 3.36, min qF = 2.80) and lowest for Dutch wax print fabrics (max qF = 0.12, min qF = 0.03). Most of the samples resisted the flow of 0.1 µm-diameter nanoparticles in droplets. Low flow resistance was observed in bandana, neck gaiter, t-shirt I, tank top and bedspread fabrics. GSM and fabric finishing seems to affect performance. Low performances can be improved by selecting optimum-performance fabrics in the design and manufacture of barrier face coverings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41742-021-00390-6.

Effectiveness of cloth face masks to prevent viral spread: a meta-analysis

“…In cloth face masks, breathability depends on the kind of fabric and the number of layers used, with more layers providing higher filtration efficiency but less breathability. 21 , 30 Our analysis focused on single-layer cloth face masks, which was the most frequently tested type in the available studies. When focusing on multi-layered masks, cloth masks might perform better than our analysis suggests, meaning that our present assessment of cloth masks represents a conservative estimate.…”

Enhancement of Antibacterial Silk Face Covering with the Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Garcinia mangostana Linn. Peel and Andrographis paniculata Extract and a Bacterial Cellulose Filter

“…Another study showed that a handmade fabric mask could not filter aerosol sizes between 30 and 600 nm, being only effective at capturing large respiratory droplets [5]. Subsequently, multi-layered structures of woven fabric were introduced to improve the filtration efficiency of materials [6,7]. Four layers of silk fabric could protect against particulate penetration ranging from 10 nm to 6 µm [8].…”

How Does Health Uncertainty Impact Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Economies? A Blessing in Disguise

“…The government enforced safety regulations that limited the peoples’ access to their professional activities, altering output and, eventually, the economy’s aggregate supply. Furthermore, constraints on free moment caused a reduction in the consumption of commodities, leading to a fall in aggregate demand and a direct impact on the environmental quality (EQ) due to reduced GHG (Muhammad et al 2020 ; Ayodeji et al 2022 ). However, pandemic breakouts have severe environmental repercussions owing to the increased volume of local and clinical waste, which may be hazardous and can spread infections to other society members if not properly managed (Syed et al 2022 ).…”