2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03618-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size distributions for cellulose nanocrystals measured by atomic force microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison

Abstract: Particle size measurements of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are challenging due to their broad size distribution, irregular shape and propensity to agglomerate. Particle size is one of the key parameters that must be measured for quality control purposes and to differentiate materials with different properties. We report the results of an interlaboratory comparison (ILC) which examined atomic force microscopy (AFM) data acquisition and data analysis protocols. Samples of CNCs deposited on poly-Llysine coated m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 4 ] The cCNCs used here have an aspect ratio of 30 ± 10 [ 14 ] and that of the sulfated CNCs is 31 ± 10; [ 29 ] those aspect ratios were determined using length and width data from individual CNCs in AFM images (i.e., the CNCs that were imaged were not touching any other CNC – determining reliable CNC dimensions by AFM and transmission electron microscopy is a heavily studied topic). [ 30 ] However, CNCs in latexes inevitably interact with each other and with the polymer film, which can affect their “apparent” aspect ratio. To that end, the “apparent” aspect ratios of the cCNCs were calculated from the AFM images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 ] The cCNCs used here have an aspect ratio of 30 ± 10 [ 14 ] and that of the sulfated CNCs is 31 ± 10; [ 29 ] those aspect ratios were determined using length and width data from individual CNCs in AFM images (i.e., the CNCs that were imaged were not touching any other CNC – determining reliable CNC dimensions by AFM and transmission electron microscopy is a heavily studied topic). [ 30 ] However, CNCs in latexes inevitably interact with each other and with the polymer film, which can affect their “apparent” aspect ratio. To that end, the “apparent” aspect ratios of the cCNCs were calculated from the AFM images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle diameter measured directly with AFM may hide undetectable lateral aggregates. Thus, the height measured from AFM was recognised as diameter, and the aspect ratios of L-CNCs were calculated by the length/height (diameter) [34,35]. Data were collected using Nanoscope 8.4 software, and images were analysed using Gwyddion analysis software.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscope (Afm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They overview practical aspects of both sample preparation and imaging. These articles are in line with the effort to standardize analytical methods in the community, especially in nanocellulose research (Foster et al, 2018;Bushell et al, 2021). Beyond the size estimation, there are currently two challenges in the morphological characterization of carbohydrate NPs: determine the three-dimensional morphology of individual particles at high resolution and better estimate the polydispersity and aggregation state at the nano-to micrometer length scales.…”
Section: Morphological Characterization Of Carbohydrate Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 64%