2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size effects on coarse soil-geogrid interface response in cyclic and post-cyclic direct shear tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, most rheology studies are focused on remolded soil samples, in which coarse particles are eliminated artificially due to the difficulty in abstracting undisturbed slip zone soil from underground [20][21][22][23]. However, coarse particles have been shown to have a significant impact on the soil mechanical strength and its deformation [24][25][26][27]. As the weakest layer controlling landslide stability, the rheological property of slip zone soil considering its original internal structure requires additional investigation to provide a more reliable and precise result for the evaluation of deformation and stability of landslides [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, most rheology studies are focused on remolded soil samples, in which coarse particles are eliminated artificially due to the difficulty in abstracting undisturbed slip zone soil from underground [20][21][22][23]. However, coarse particles have been shown to have a significant impact on the soil mechanical strength and its deformation [24][25][26][27]. As the weakest layer controlling landslide stability, the rheological property of slip zone soil considering its original internal structure requires additional investigation to provide a more reliable and precise result for the evaluation of deformation and stability of landslides [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potyondy (1961), Brandt (1985), Yin et al (1995), Hu and Pu (2004), Taha and Fall (2013), Chen et al (2015), and Afzali-Nejad et al (2017) performed 2-D monotonic interface tests between soil and structure/geotextile, which are the most straightforward loading types. Numerous investigators (Desai et al 1985;Al-Douri and Poulos 1992;DeJong et al 2006 and2009;Miller and Hamid 2007;Mortara et al 2007;Khoury and Miller 2012;Di Donna et al 2016;Wang et al 2016;Boukpeti and White 2017; Farhadi and Lashkari 2017) performed series of 2-D direct-shear tests of interfaces to obtain a sound understanding of the 2-D cyclic behavior of soil-structure interfaces, especially the behavior of sand-structure interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most experimental studies have limited this scope on results from triaxial tests. In spite of their shortcomings (Andersen, 2009), simple shear tests have been preferred to triaxial tests since the interface shearing is much better reproduced through this type of testing, even if direct shear testing could also be considered (Pra-Ai, 2013;Pra-Ai & Boulon, 2017;Wang, Liu, Wang, & Cai, 2016). Similarly, even if it is now currently accepted that the shearing of a soil-pile interface occurs at a relatively constant normal stiffness (Fakharian & Evgin, 1997), a conservative approach would be to in perform constant volume simple shear tests, which maximises the degradation of the effective normal stress, as previously done in (Andersen, 2009;Dyvik, Berre, Lacasse, & Raadim, 1987;Lambe & Whitman, 1969) for instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%