2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/citsm50537.2020.9268865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Swarm Optimization Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Iris results presented inNasiri and Shakibian (2022) andSingaravelan et al (2018) for example, show the accuracies of 96% and 98%, while Wine results in(Deng et al, 2017;Nasiri & Shakibian, 2022) are 98.73% and 100%, respectively. Comparable performance also can be seen in Breast Cancer and Heart, for example in(Nurhayati, Agustian, & Lubis, 2020) (Breast Cancer-98.07%), (…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iris results presented inNasiri and Shakibian (2022) andSingaravelan et al (2018) for example, show the accuracies of 96% and 98%, while Wine results in(Deng et al, 2017;Nasiri & Shakibian, 2022) are 98.73% and 100%, respectively. Comparable performance also can be seen in Breast Cancer and Heart, for example in(Nurhayati, Agustian, & Lubis, 2020) (Breast Cancer-98.07%), (…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Iris results presented in Nasiri and Shakibian (2022) and Singaravelan et al (2018) for example, show the accuracies of 96% and 98%, while Wine results in (Deng et al, 2017; Nasiri & Shakibian, 2022) are 98.73% and 100%, respectively. Comparable performance also can be seen in Breast Cancer and Heart, for example in (Nurhayati, Agustian, & Lubis, 2020) (Breast Cancer—98.07%), (Islam et al, 2020) (Breast Cancer—97.14%), (Panup et al, 2022) (Heart—82.9%) and (Khanom et al, 2020) (Heart—86.89%). Finally, the performance of SVM with Cardiotocography is also compared, for example 74.92% in Amin et al (2019), 86.59% in Prasetyo et al (2021) and 84.38% in Parvathsuman et al (2019).…”
Section: Weighted Grcmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We observe a decrease in the performance of ResNet trained from scratch when interpolation is included in the data augmentation, suggesting that interpolation corrupts local texture structures. S. Swetha Et.al [20] aim to create an affordable, multifunctional, personalized oral detecting equipment that processing aid and categorizes Network to classify oral disorders.. From the experimental results, it is observed that CNN performed well with an accuracy of 91% Nurhayati Et.al [21] present Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) was used to enhance the effectiveness of different classifiers such as SVM, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and KNN. That classification model is used both to assess the efficiency level as well as a classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars focus on the feature selection of data [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In the process of prediction, feature selection can eliminate irrelevant variables and redundant features to achieve effective dimensionality reduction and improve the accuracy of the algorithm [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%