2004
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2004.825102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Swarm Optimization Versus Genetic Algorithms for Phased Array Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
401
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 831 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
401
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this problem has also been a central and well studied problem with a strong engineering background in the field of manufacturing and telecommunications science [3,4]. In order to solve this problem, many methods have been proposed to obtain the multi-pattern arrays in previous literatures [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this problem has also been a central and well studied problem with a strong engineering background in the field of manufacturing and telecommunications science [3,4]. In order to solve this problem, many methods have been proposed to obtain the multi-pattern arrays in previous literatures [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades various optimization techniques like Genetic Algorithm (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Bees Algorithm (BA) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] in addition to many hybrid optimization methods [8][9][10] have been used for optimizing parameters in the antenna and antenna arrays problem. Each of these methods has its own pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the MO design method of time-modulated linear arrays, we undertake a twofold comparative study over three significant instantiations of the design problem involving 16, 32, and 64 elements linear array. Firstly we compare the three kinds of design methodologies for linear arrays: the time modulation, the nonuniform excitation [21,22] and the phase-position method [23] using MOEA/D-DE to achieve the design objectives in each case. This comparison reflects the superiority of the time-modulation method over the two others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%