2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01674-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particulate Matter Monitoring and Assessment through Internet of Things: a Health Information System for Enhanced Living Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supplementary I nformation 2 details the main characteristics of included studies. There were 22 studies conducted in Europe; five in the UK (Wigzell et al 2000 ; Nasir and Colbeck 2013 ; O’Leary et al 2018 ; Chakraborty et al 2020 ; Shehab et al 2021 ); three in Portugal (Alves et al 2020 ; Madureira et al 2020 ; Marques and Pitarma 2020 ); two each in Sweden (Molnar et al 2005 ; Omelekhina et al 2022 ), Italy (Frasca et al 2018 ; Pietrogrande et al 2021 ) and Greece (Sarigiannis et al 2014 ; Assimakopoulos et al 2018 ); one each in Finland (Siponen et al 2019 ), Norway (Wyss et al 2016 ), Denmark (Karottki et al 2014 ), Germany (Salthammer et al 2014 ), Poland (Jedrychowski et al 2006 ), Switzerland (Monn et al 1997 ) and Belgium (Stranger et al 2009 ); and one study was multicentric (UK and the Republic of Ireland) (Semple et al 2012 ). There was only one study each from Asia (Japan) (Ohura et al 2005 ), the Middle East (Kuwait) (Yassin et al 2012 ), Oceania (Australia) (Mazaheri et al 2018 ) and South America (Chile) (Rojas-Bracho et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supplementary I nformation 2 details the main characteristics of included studies. There were 22 studies conducted in Europe; five in the UK (Wigzell et al 2000 ; Nasir and Colbeck 2013 ; O’Leary et al 2018 ; Chakraborty et al 2020 ; Shehab et al 2021 ); three in Portugal (Alves et al 2020 ; Madureira et al 2020 ; Marques and Pitarma 2020 ); two each in Sweden (Molnar et al 2005 ; Omelekhina et al 2022 ), Italy (Frasca et al 2018 ; Pietrogrande et al 2021 ) and Greece (Sarigiannis et al 2014 ; Assimakopoulos et al 2018 ); one each in Finland (Siponen et al 2019 ), Norway (Wyss et al 2016 ), Denmark (Karottki et al 2014 ), Germany (Salthammer et al 2014 ), Poland (Jedrychowski et al 2006 ), Switzerland (Monn et al 1997 ) and Belgium (Stranger et al 2009 ); and one study was multicentric (UK and the Republic of Ireland) (Semple et al 2012 ). There was only one study each from Asia (Japan) (Ohura et al 2005 ), the Middle East (Kuwait) (Yassin et al 2012 ), Oceania (Australia) (Mazaheri et al 2018 ) and South America (Chile) (Rojas-Bracho et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies investigated PM 2.5 concentrations associated with solid fuel appliances other than just wood combustion. Two studies examined biomass-burning fireplaces, with one reported the daily mean being 31.1 μg/m 3 (Marques and Pitarma 2020 ), and the other estimated the 24-h mean PM 2.5 concentration at 50 μg/m 3 during a cold period whilst fireplaces were operating (Sarigiannis et al 2014 ). One study investigated two types of solid fuel combustion, coal and peat burning, with 24-h mean PM 2.5 concentrations measured at 7.4 and 10.9 μg/m 3 , respectively (Semple et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Korea, most of the PM-related public health policies and clinical interventions remain based on outdoor environments monitored by the conventional station-based method due to the lack of efforts to promote a large-scale personalized monitoring [24,25]. Recently, a number of monitoring efforts have been undertaken including a feasibility study to assess indoor PM exposure, but most of them focused on fixed IoT devices which failed to capture the concurrent air pollution and environmental monitoring data from their real-time locations [26,27]. Despite a handful of recent studies on real-time sensing of indoor and outdoor PM exposure using a low-cost portable device in South Korea [28,29], personally monitored PM data were not thoroughly evaluated for feasibility and accuracy in comparison to conventional data from station-based area monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%