2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parties’ voter targeting strategies: What can facebook ads tell us?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voters recognize and dislike being targeted (Hersh & Schaffner 2013), and some parties in fact voluntarily restrict their targeting for ethical reasons (Pauly & Stotz 2019). The literature has largely focused on the targets (Lovett & Peress 2015;Stuckelberger & Koedam 2022) and contents (Benoit & Hansen 2002) of campaign ads separately despite incentives to tailor. Previous work on tailoring could not disentangle the strategic behavior of parties from biases introduced by ad delivery algorithms (Fowler et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Voters recognize and dislike being targeted (Hersh & Schaffner 2013), and some parties in fact voluntarily restrict their targeting for ethical reasons (Pauly & Stotz 2019). The literature has largely focused on the targets (Lovett & Peress 2015;Stuckelberger & Koedam 2022) and contents (Benoit & Hansen 2002) of campaign ads separately despite incentives to tailor. Previous work on tailoring could not disentangle the strategic behavior of parties from biases introduced by ad delivery algorithms (Fowler et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, few researchers have studied the tailoring of campaign ads. The literature has largely focused on the targets (Lovett & Peress 2015;Stuckelberger & Koedam 2022) and contents (Benoit & Hansen 2002) of campaign ads separately despite strong incentives to tailor. Going beyond gender, Zárate et al (2023) show that candidates benefit from appealing to Hispanic voters in Spanish.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campaigns now extensively rely on propensity scores to target most likely voters (Endres & Kelly, 2018;Stuckelberger & Koedam, 2022). By doing so, they activate those who we call marginal abstainers, people "on the fence" to turn out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we have reasons to believe that the shift to microtargeting has made voter turnout efforts more similar to our simulations. Campaigns now extensively rely on propensity scores to target most likely voters (Endres & Kelly, 2018; Stuckelberger & Koedam, 2022). By doing so, they activate those who we call marginal abstainers, people “on the fence” to turn out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, targeting citizens based on their geographic location is a straightforward way for political actors to reach citizens within their constituency but also to mobilize any regional strongholds (Stuckelberger and Koedam, 2022). Socio-demographic targeting aims at groups with shared characteristics, such as age, gender, income, or education level.…”
Section: Targeting and Exclusion Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%