2022
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2022.2087387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partisan attachments in a multidimensional space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, scholars have focused more on party positions in a comparative context rather than on individual legislators' positions on specific policies (Lupu 2015). Secondly, the multidimensionality of the European political space needs to be considered, both in terms of individual preferences and party positions (Dassonneville, Fournier, and Somer-Topcu 2023).…”
Section: Beyond Content: Position Blurring and Nichenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, scholars have focused more on party positions in a comparative context rather than on individual legislators' positions on specific policies (Lupu 2015). Secondly, the multidimensionality of the European political space needs to be considered, both in terms of individual preferences and party positions (Dassonneville, Fournier, and Somer-Topcu 2023).…”
Section: Beyond Content: Position Blurring and Nichenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the substantive implications of our approach, we analyze the relationship between party polarization and mass partisanship. As discussed, the ideological differentiation between parties can affect voter attitudes and behavior, including their political engagement (e.g., Adams, De Vries and Leiter, 2012;Bischof and Wagner, 2019;Dassonneville, Fournier and Somer-Topcu, 2022;Hobolt and Hoerner, 2020;Levendusky, 2010).…”
Section: Party Polarization and Mass Partisanshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going back to the Dutch example from Figure 1, for example, the misrepresentation of the cultural differences between parties from a one-dimensional conception may lead us to underestimate their ideological distinctiveness and how it informs voters seeking to identity the party that best represents them. Indeed, that these cultural differences matter is evident from studies by Adams, Ezrow and Leiter (2012) and Dassonneville, Fournier and Somer-Topcu (2022), who show that cultural and multidimensional party positions are key for understanding voters' evolving ideological preferences and partisan attachments. This highlights the importance of employing a measure that is sensitive to this dimension of political conflict.…”
Section: Party Polarization and Mass Partisanshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations