Proceedings of OCEANS '93
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1993.326053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning algorithms in underwater passive target tracking

Abstract: Abshnnct -The area of underwater passive target tracking has received considerable attention in the past decades, due to both its theoretical interest and its practical importance in several applications. Many powerful tools fhm the fields of signal processing, image processing, and estimation theory have been brought to bear for the solution of the passive target tracking problem. Among the latter, techniques based on Kalman filtering and techniques based on partitioning filters have been successfully used. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of input/onset-time estimation with the interacting multiple model algorithm appeared in [13] (with follow-up comments contained in [52] and [65]), demonstrating the comparable performance of the IMM algorithm at lower computational complexity. Several methods based on partitioning (multiple model) filters have been reviewed in the context of bearings-only tracking for non-manoeuvring and manoeuvring targets in [71], and their performance compared with that of a single Kalman filter technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of input/onset-time estimation with the interacting multiple model algorithm appeared in [13] (with follow-up comments contained in [52] and [65]), demonstrating the comparable performance of the IMM algorithm at lower computational complexity. Several methods based on partitioning (multiple model) filters have been reviewed in the context of bearings-only tracking for non-manoeuvring and manoeuvring targets in [71], and their performance compared with that of a single Kalman filter technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%