2015
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics

Abstract: Recent work has demonstrated that some functional categories of the genome contribute disproportionately to the heritability of complex diseases. Here, we analyze a broad set of functional elements, including cell-type-specific elements, to estimate their polygenic contributions to heritability in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 17 complex diseases and traits with an average sample size of 73,599. To enable this analysis, we introduce a new method, stratified LD score regression, for partitioning her… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

114
3,627
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,356 publications
(3,892 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
114
3,627
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We then applied stratified LD score regression to determine if various functional categories (cell‐type groups, annotations at the tissue/cell level for brain or immune cells, and sets of brain and immune gene lists) were enriched for heritability. LD score regression exploits the expected relationships between true association signals and local LD around them to correct out systematic biases and arrive at unbiased estimates of genetic heritability within a given set of SNPs (here stratified according to their functional category) 31. Following Finucane et al,31 we added annotations individually to the baseline model; we used HapMap Project Phase 3 SNPs for the regression and 1000 Genomes Project European population SNPs for the reference panel; we only partitioned the heritability of SNPs with minor allele frequency >5%; and we excluded the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region from analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We then applied stratified LD score regression to determine if various functional categories (cell‐type groups, annotations at the tissue/cell level for brain or immune cells, and sets of brain and immune gene lists) were enriched for heritability. LD score regression exploits the expected relationships between true association signals and local LD around them to correct out systematic biases and arrive at unbiased estimates of genetic heritability within a given set of SNPs (here stratified according to their functional category) 31. Following Finucane et al,31 we added annotations individually to the baseline model; we used HapMap Project Phase 3 SNPs for the regression and 1000 Genomes Project European population SNPs for the reference panel; we only partitioned the heritability of SNPs with minor allele frequency >5%; and we excluded the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region from analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LD score regression exploits the expected relationships between true association signals and local LD around them to correct out systematic biases and arrive at unbiased estimates of genetic heritability within a given set of SNPs (here stratified according to their functional category) 31. Following Finucane et al,31 we added annotations individually to the baseline model; we used HapMap Project Phase 3 SNPs for the regression and 1000 Genomes Project European population SNPs for the reference panel; we only partitioned the heritability of SNPs with minor allele frequency >5%; and we excluded the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region from analysis. The high LD and strong association signals within the MHC region results in a dominating effect on LD score regression, and for the purposes of our analyses excluding this region result in a conservative approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations