2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2005.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partitioning methods for reaction–diffusion problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the transformed Riemann problem reads (18) is also a shock solution of (4)- (6). The type of the shock is the same as in (17).…”
Section: Theorem 43 For Everyûmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the transformed Riemann problem reads (18) is also a shock solution of (4)- (6). The type of the shock is the same as in (17).…”
Section: Theorem 43 For Everyûmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, for the choice 0 = · · · = lev max −1 = 0 one will obtain a uniform grid of level lev max . A similar algorithm to steer the structure of the grid was proposed in [6], the only difference being that there a scaled Z 2 indicator was used instead of the gradient indicator proposed here.…”
Section: Grid Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and heat transfer has led to physically interesting and mathematically challenging problems related to the nontrivial numerical solution of the singularly perturbed initial/boundary value problem [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In general, solution of the singularly perturbed problem contains high-gradient boundary layers along the boundary of the domain [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decade, many techniques of the finite element method for solving the singularly perturbed problems have been proposed and investigated [2,4,7,8,11,12]. The conventional Galerkin finite element method usually fails to analyze such unsteady reaction-diffusion problems when either the diffusion coefficient becomes small or a small time step is employed in the time discretization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%