Partizipative Konzepte, Methoden und Techniken zur Optimierung der Softwareentwicklung

Rauterberg, Matthias

doi:10.1007/978-3-663-09281-0_5

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This means that to work on content together and to communicate, the participants and moderators used a technical platform or learning environment, respectively. The learning environment, edubreak® -Sportcampus 2.0, was developed in close consultation between entrepreneurs 2 and members of the Table Tennis Association of Lower Saxony within 12 months, thereby implementing the approach of a "participative" or "agile" software development [7]. In this case, one can additionally speak of a "participative development of didactics" since media-didactical as well as methodological training experts worked on the same goal.…”

Section: Learning Platformmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Tools 2.0 in Trainer Education

Vohle

2009

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An overview is provided of the didactic design and evaluation of a blended-learning environment of an advanced training course for the C-Trainer license in table tennis. The focus lies on new online applications (Web 2.0) that serve the didactical function of cognitive tools. These actively support the learner-centered construction of trainer-specific knowledge. The evaluation in the praxis of sports associations consists of a formative and a summative part and is mainly based on questioning of the participants and instructors (qualitative study). The results show that the blended-learning structure is highly accepted by the participants. Furthermore, the findings show that the combination of the implemented online tools in the form of a time-stamp based video player, concept mapping and Weblogs can support competency-oriented learning.

show abstract

Section: Learning Platformmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Tools 2.0 in Trainer Education

Vohle

2009

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The basis for the use model itself is the information collected directly from the users which means library user and librarians. This process gives primary attention to the results of the task analysis (Rauterberg, 1994). The following characteristics are of particular importance in the struture design phase:static task structure;paths of action;required functions and information;rules of execution and related requirements; andcontextual parameters such as priority and frequency.The use model depends on the help of simply understandable constructs.…”

Section: Development Process For User Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Useware engineering: a methodology for the development of user‐friendly interfaces

Zuehlke

Thiels

2008

Library Hi Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe development time for user interfaces is drastically reduced by today's shorter product life cycles. Generally, at the end of the development phase, there is not enough time or money left to enhance the usability of software. After the user interface has been developed, the users are left alone to handle any problems with the interface. Systematic development using engineering processes can help to overcome these usability problems. Engineering processes identify and consider clearly defined requirements during the development phase. This results in more usable products and a growing recognition of the importance of engineering processes. This article aims to introduce a structured Useware engineering process that increases the effectiveness and efficiency of user interface development.Design/methodology/approachThis article introduces a structured Useware engineering process, the application of which enhances user orientation which leads to higher acceptance and more practical user interfaces.FindingsThe article finds that the current process is supported by various expert development tools for the production of user interfaces; these tools ensure a systematic and continuous data transferability from one phase to the next. The process has already provided remarkable results in the area of task orientation and usability within several different industrial sectors, e.g. medicine, manufacturing industry and process engineering. Further possibilities to apply this process are software for online catolog planning or lending and return machines.Originality/valueThis article introduces a structured engineering process that increases the effectiveness and efficiency of user interface development which has the possibility of use in online catolog planning or lending and return machines.

show abstract

“…Als Erfolgskriterien sind ergebnis-bezogen die Leistung und Qualität des Systems, der Kosten-und Zeitaufwand für dessen Ent-wicklung sowie prozeßbezogen die Zufriedenheit aller Projektbeteiligten und -betroffenen mit dem Projektverlauf und dessen Ergebnis von Relevanz. (Rauterberg 1991;Weltz & Ortmann 1992;Spinas et al 1993). Man kann feststellen (Weltz & Ortmann 1992), daß traditionelle Organisationsmodelle bei der Softwareentwicklung mit Problemen verbunden sind, welche Zweifel daran aufkommen lassen (Ulich 1991), ob in solchen Projektstrukturen in effizienter Weise benutzer-und aufgabenangemessene Software entstehen kann ).…”

Section: Aufbaumodell Für Den Softwareentwicklungsprozeßunclassified

Anforderungen an die Prozessgestaltung der Softwareentwicklung

Rauterberg

1993

Berichte Des German Chapter of the ACM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Partizipative Konzepte, Methoden und Techniken zur Optimierung der Softwareentwicklung

Cited by 8 publications

References 25 publications

Cognitive Tools 2.0 in Trainer Education

Cognitive Tools 2.0 in Trainer Education

Useware engineering: a methodology for the development of user‐friendly interfaces

Anforderungen an die Prozessgestaltung der Softwareentwicklung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About