2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02115-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partner involvement in abortion trajectories and subsequent abortion safety in Nigeria and Côte d’Ivoire

Abstract: Background Unsafe abortions contribute to maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide, with disproportionate impacts in lower-income countries. Identifying factors associated with an elevated risk of experiencing an abortion under the most unsafe conditions is an important component of addressing this burden. The partner’s role in obtaining a safe or unsafe abortion is not well understood. This study provides a quantitative assessment of the relationship between partner involvement and subsequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the pilot study that these data were collected for had an eligibility requirement that pharmacy SMA clients must have purchased the abortion medications themselves (rather than a male partner). Because partner acquisition of medications is common,42 the SMA group in the present analysis may be different from others who self-manage in Bangladesh, possibly making findings less generalisable. Third, the facilities included in the pilot study were receiving an intervention24 that was intended to improve quality and may not be representative of all abortion facilities in Bangladesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Second, the pilot study that these data were collected for had an eligibility requirement that pharmacy SMA clients must have purchased the abortion medications themselves (rather than a male partner). Because partner acquisition of medications is common,42 the SMA group in the present analysis may be different from others who self-manage in Bangladesh, possibly making findings less generalisable. Third, the facilities included in the pilot study were receiving an intervention24 that was intended to improve quality and may not be representative of all abortion facilities in Bangladesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%