2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnership for development: A peer mentorship model for PhD students

Abstract: Formal mentoring relationships socialize Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) students to their current and future roles as nursing scholars. Despite formal mentoring, some students may desire or benefit from additional mentoring in an informal setting. Informal mentoring complements the one-to-one relationship students develop with a primary faculty mentor or dissertation chair. This manuscript describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a student-driven, peer mentorship model, titled Partnership for D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pyhältö and colleagues (2012) found those PGRs who actively engaged in their scholarly community found this to be their central resource of support on their doctoral journey. Likewise, doctoral student networks or peer-support models have been found to increase a sense of morale, and improve wellbeing (Lewinski et al, 2017;Galica et al, 2018). Why more students in this study did not seek support from their peers, colleagues, and friends may require further investigation but this should encourage Universities to consider promoting peer support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Pyhältö and colleagues (2012) found those PGRs who actively engaged in their scholarly community found this to be their central resource of support on their doctoral journey. Likewise, doctoral student networks or peer-support models have been found to increase a sense of morale, and improve wellbeing (Lewinski et al, 2017;Galica et al, 2018). Why more students in this study did not seek support from their peers, colleagues, and friends may require further investigation but this should encourage Universities to consider promoting peer support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The Young Peers exercised own governance which further fostered their growth in research leaderships and organization. This model prepared young faculty early in on in undertaking their mentoring role and cultivating healthy relationships with colleagues along and across academic ranks, elements that are critical for successful mentorship [14][15][16]. Overall, our model of mentorship was unique in its design and implementation which enhances support between senior and junior faculty, between peer junior faculty, between junior faculty and students, and between student mentees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer-to-peer mentoring helps both mentors and protégés to learn communication, documentation and leadership skills [41, 42]. PhD students in particular, can benefit from peer mentoring as their colleagues can assist them and socialise them into their role as future scholars [43]. Mid-career faculty are more likely than late-career faculty to be interested in serving as mentors [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%