Partnerships, Suppliers And Coercive Influence

Abstract

<span>This paper adapts intra-firm influence strategies to an inter-firm context. In the process it retests the link between coercive influence strategies and supplier performance. Qualitative data is drawn from interviews conducted with 17 informants in the Australian Recruitment Industry. In line with expectations, the study shows that intra-firm influence strategies are adaptable to an inter-firm context. Contrary to predictions, the study finds that suppliers use frequent checking and persistent reminders (pressure strategy), benefits and favors (exchange strategy), form coalitions with other suppliers and buyer managers (coalition strategy) and go over a buyer managers head (upward appeals) to improve their performance in partnerships. These findings suggest that suppliers use a wider set of influence strategies than previously reported in the literature. In short, influence strategies are more heterogeneous than previously implied in the literature.</span>

Guanxi influence system : understanding influence tactics from the perspective of Guanxi

“…These include: legitimating, rational persuasion, inspirational appeal, consultation, exchange, personal appeal, ingratiation, pressure, and coalition. As there are many similarities between the intrafirm and interfirm tactics, researchers have found that intrafirm influence tactics are adaptable for interfirm usage (Bignoux & Gray, 2011;Boyle, Dwyer, Robicheaux, & Simpson, 1992). Thus, in this paper I use the intrafirm labels for both intra and interfirm contexts.…”