Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parts-based 3D object classification

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
77
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D object recognition is still a new research area. Huber et al [10] matched laser rangefinder data to learned object models. Other techniques build 3D object models and match them to still images using local descriptors [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D object recognition is still a new research area. Huber et al [10] matched laser rangefinder data to learned object models. Other techniques build 3D object models and match them to still images using local descriptors [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matching score is usually calculated via key-features and spatial descriptors. Such models are reported in [7,8] and show good results using spin-image based descriptors. Additionally, Frome et al [9] introduce 3D and harmonic shape context descriptors, and Mian et al [10] present a matching score which is based on a robust multidimensional table representation of objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some classification methods that use this information directly [7], [8]. The classification based solely on 3-D information is difficult in the context of the current 3-D reconstruction systems because the information is not accurate enough to allow the reliable extraction of 3-D shapes and surfaces.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%