2006
DOI: 10.1080/02589340601122901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Dominance ‘Theory’: Of What Value?

Abstract: This paper critiques the alleged value of the notion of 'party dominance' or the 'dominant party system', mainly propagated in South Africa by Roger Southall, Hermann Giliomee and Charles Simkins, and very much in vogue amongst scholars in the Netherlands, and to some extent in the USA and other places. Its overseas lineage is traced and its explanatory powers critiqued. It is argued that the approach is flawed democratically in being antipopular and that it also lacks explanatory value. It is argued that it i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adam (1999) draws attention to the ANC's role in dampening the heightened expectations of the poor and acknowledges that the dominant party brings long-term stability, offers short-term safeguards for fearful minorities, and allows democratic institutions to take root. Suttner (2006) criticizes the notion of a 'dominant party' as intrinsically conservative because it assumes only an electoral, bourgeois type of democracy, rather than one based on popular participation and decision-making. The ANC in South Africa always contained this potential to represent working and poor peoples' interests in a genuine sense.…”
Section: The Decline Of the Anc As The Main Integrating Institutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Adam (1999) draws attention to the ANC's role in dampening the heightened expectations of the poor and acknowledges that the dominant party brings long-term stability, offers short-term safeguards for fearful minorities, and allows democratic institutions to take root. Suttner (2006) criticizes the notion of a 'dominant party' as intrinsically conservative because it assumes only an electoral, bourgeois type of democracy, rather than one based on popular participation and decision-making. The ANC in South Africa always contained this potential to represent working and poor peoples' interests in a genuine sense.…”
Section: The Decline Of the Anc As The Main Integrating Institutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is not only a question of diversity of identity, but also a manifestation of pluralism that the ANC and other NLMs have not always welcomed. The ANC has not appreciated that identity is not purely a subjective state, but often relates to plurality of objective interests, which may be quite autonomous (see Suttner 2004aSuttner , 2006.…”
Section: The National Liberation Counter-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it is proposed that in instances where the ruling party is so strong that it is unlikely to suffer electoral defeat in the foreseeable future this presents a danger to or may preclude defining a state as a consolidated democracy. Such reasoning has been applied to South Africa, and the literature that does so has not considered why existing opposition parties are unlikely to defeat the ANC, even at its present moment of crisis (Suttner 2004a(Suttner , 2006. This dogma, for it is not an explanatory device, but merely a statement or declaration of what criteria need to be met by political forces to qualify as consolidated, is usually accompanied by a literature criticising what is referred to as the 'dominant party state' (Southall 2005, but see Suttner 2006.…”
Section: Western Paradigms Applied To South African Social Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of a “dominant party‐state” (Suttner, , pp. 277–297; Wines, ) has three potential problems.…”
Section: A Dominant Party‐state?mentioning
confidence: 99%