2015
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2014.944319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Leaders in the Media and Voting Behavior: Priming Rather Than Learning or Projection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings of informational effects of new leaders run in parallel with recent findings in the literature that argue that leaders still matter (Farrell and Webb, ; Mughan, ; Garzia, ; Takens et al., ; Somer‐Topcu, ). As we have shown, new leaders have the opportunity to change voters' perceptions of parties, especially when the party is doing particularly poorly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings of informational effects of new leaders run in parallel with recent findings in the literature that argue that leaders still matter (Farrell and Webb, ; Mughan, ; Garzia, ; Takens et al., ; Somer‐Topcu, ). As we have shown, new leaders have the opportunity to change voters' perceptions of parties, especially when the party is doing particularly poorly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For instance, extant literature in political science has found the high cost of information acquisition and the importance of simplified cues for voting behavior (see, for instance, Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee, ; Ferejohn and Kuklinski, ; Popkin, ; Zaller, ; Fortunato and Stevenson, ). On top of this, research has found that voting behavior is highly dependent on the party candidate and not just on the party label (Farrell and Webb, ; Mughan, ; Garzia, ; Takens et al., ). On the other hand, party leadership change implies an increase of information, whether in the form of media coverage—due to the newsworthiness of the change (McQuail, )—or in the form of increased attacks from other parties trying to “define” the new leader.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging number of independent candidates in Uganda's politics can be explained by these findings and political parties should ensure that cohesion should concern all party leaders because it is a determining factor in party democracy and discipline. Takens et al (2015) argue that personalisation of political parties influences policy debates during election campaigns. Party leaders freely associate with voters during party meetings, National Conference, and media.…”
Section: Ayeta Et Al 79mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means not only that there should be a large quantity of news about politics, but also that it should include the viewpoints and performances of all political parties taking part in the election, without bias towards a particular party. A strong focus on leaders at the expense of other candidates (Takens et al 2015) or coverage with strong emotional rather than detached overtones (Martinsen 2009) could hamper this ideal of rational opinion-building and voting.…”
Section: News Quality From An Electoral Democratic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from a democratic perspective a high leader focus is less desirable. It leads to personalized voting -voters who weigh evaluations of political leaders more heavily than issue positions (Takens et al 2015) which goes against the ideals of the electoral democratic model, which holds both as important (Strömbäck 2005). Also, a stronger focus on leaders means less attention to other candidates of the same party, whom people may also vote for in countries with a preferential vote system such as Austria.…”
Section: Rq1a: What Is the Amount Of Political Coverage In Online Andmentioning
confidence: 99%