Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective 1999
DOI: 10.4135/9781446218518.n3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Members and Ideological Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the 1997 British election surveys are the only ones currently available that include all the necessary questions in both the pre-and post-election panel waves, these are not issues that we can address empirically. However, we would point out that the 1997 election was an exceptional contest because it was marked by less ideological and policy polarization between the two main parties than other elections since the 1960s (Budge 1999;Sanders 1999b;Webb and Farrell 1999). Thus, the results we obtain for 1997 are probably weaker than what they would have been in previous elections.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Given that the 1997 British election surveys are the only ones currently available that include all the necessary questions in both the pre-and post-election panel waves, these are not issues that we can address empirically. However, we would point out that the 1997 election was an exceptional contest because it was marked by less ideological and policy polarization between the two main parties than other elections since the 1960s (Budge 1999;Sanders 1999b;Webb and Farrell 1999). Thus, the results we obtain for 1997 are probably weaker than what they would have been in previous elections.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…First, there is no evidence that party loyalties in Britain are more fixed and the British party system more ideologically polarized than in other countries. By the 1997 election British politics was in many ways less polarized and British party supporters less attached, than at any previous time for which measures can be obtained (Budge 1999; Crewe and Thomson 1999; Sanders 1999b; Webb and Farrell 1999). This suggests that short‐term influences, such as the economy, might have greater latitude to cause swings in party popularity than in earlier periods (Alvarez, Nagler, and Bowler 2000; Sanders 1999a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in 1964 the ratio was one Labour employee to every 2786 individual members of the Labour Party. By 1998, the ratio was 1:1231, a net change of 56 per cent (Webb and Fisher 2001, 5; 2003, 10). For the Conservatives, the change has been even more significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, by using the BES, the number of cases of Labour members is limited; we are unable to use the full party membership survey since comparable questions were not asked. That said, sample sizes of this magnitude have been successfully analysed in the past (Seyd and Whiteley 1992; Webb and Farrell 1999), so again, such data should be sufficient for us to derive a broad impression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%