2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055416000162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Policy Diffusion

Abstract: Do parties learn from or emulate parties in other political systems? This research develops the argument that parties are more likely to employ the heuristic of learning from and emulatingforeign successful (incumbent) parties. Spatial-econometric analyses of parties’ election policies from several established democracies robustly confirm that political parties respond to left-right policy positions of foreign political parties that have recently governed. By showing that parties respond to theseforeign incumb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(236 reference statements)
2
119
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the study of underlying assumptions of diffusion and the ideological use of decisions from other countries are questions of agenda-setting and issue-definition (not the adoption itself). Not only governments, parliaments and civil servants, but also parties think tanks and other political actors are key in these processes (Böhmelt et al 2016). Third, this proposed broader theoretical and empirical focus should come with greater diversity in research designs and methods, since standard approaches are not necessarily well adapted to studying the new questions outlined in this article (Gilardi 2016), not least because they often imply a focus on policy adoption that, as we have shown, prevents researchers from fully exploring the politics of policy diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the study of underlying assumptions of diffusion and the ideological use of decisions from other countries are questions of agenda-setting and issue-definition (not the adoption itself). Not only governments, parliaments and civil servants, but also parties think tanks and other political actors are key in these processes (Böhmelt et al 2016). Third, this proposed broader theoretical and empirical focus should come with greater diversity in research designs and methods, since standard approaches are not necessarily well adapted to studying the new questions outlined in this article (Gilardi 2016), not least because they often imply a focus on policy adoption that, as we have shown, prevents researchers from fully exploring the politics of policy diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recent developments in the empirical literature on party competition (Williams, ; Williams and Whitten, ; Williams, Seki, and Whitten, ; Böhmelt et al., ), we estimate spatial temporal autoregressive models or “spatial lag models” (Franzese and Hays, , ). They are able to capture the spatial dependence among party positions directly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W y e – 1 is the product of this connectivity matrix and the policy positions of all other parties in the previous election. We do not row‐standardize the connectivity matrix (Plümper and Neumayer, ) as we assume that the amount of attention the focal party pays to other parties does depend on the number of rival parties (Williams, ; Williams and Whitten, ; Williams, Seki, and Whitten, ; Böhmelt et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, the work on comparative political economy meshes well with the long-running programme on the diffusion of policies, which started with work on the US states (Berry and Berry 1990), has become more theoretical in orientation (Shipan and Volden 2008), and has expanded to study international policies (e.g. Hays 2009; see also Graham et al 2013; Gilardi 2010 for reviews), and examines the diffusion of policies between political parties (Böhmelt et al 2016).…”
Section: Convergence and Globalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%