The first description of what is now known as antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated necrotizing vasculitis appeared more than 140 yr ago. Since then, many aspects of the pathogenic pathway have been elucidated, indicating the involvement of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies, but why antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies are produced in the first place remains unknown. Over the years, many hypotheses have emerged addressing the etiology of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody production, but no exclusive factor or set of factors can so far be held responsible. Herein is reviewed the most influential hypotheses regarding the causes of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis with the aim of placing in an epidemiologic background the different hypotheses that are centered on environmental and genetic influences.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 237-252, 2008237-252, . doi: 10.2215 A ntineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated necrotizing vasculitis was probably first described in 1866 by Kussmaul and Maier (1) as "polyarteritis nodosa." It was not until the early 1930s when the first case of what was later named Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) was described (2). The disease was named after Friedrich Wegener, who described it as an entity in 1939 (3). In 1985, antibodies associated with the disease were detected and later became known as ANCA (4). WG is a systemic autoimmune disease that can cause damage in various organs. Later, microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) was distinguished as a separate ANCA-associated vasculitis. The disease-or its immunosuppressive treatment-can cause high levels of morbidity and death, especially in patients with renal involvement. Animal experiments have shown that ANCA directed against myeloperoxidase (MPO) can cause vasculitis that resembles human vasculitic disease (5,6); however, the cause of ANCA production remains unresolved.Theories have been developed to explain how ANCA could interact with neutrophils, along with monocytes and most probably T lymphocytes, to form the lesions that are characteristic of ANCA-associated vasculitis, such as fibrinoid necrosis and granulomas (7). A recent theory of interest has been postulated by Pendergraft et al. (8), stating that an antibody against the complementary peptide of proteinase-3 (PR3) in an idiotypic/anti-idiotypic network is essential to the development of ANCA and to the development of clinical vasculitis, but why and how these ANCA are produced in the first place remains unanswered. Nonetheless, many hypotheses have been developed about the initiating factor for ANCA production. Many factors, either directly or indirectly, have been considered important in the development of ANCA: Silica exposure (9); genetic predisposition (10); bacterial infection by Staphylococcus aureus (11); viral infection by, for instance, parvovirus B19 (12); and thyroid drugs (13) all have been correlated with and held to contribute to the incidence of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Some of these hypotheses are still th...