2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PASS2: an automated database of protein alignments organised as structural superfamilies

Abstract: BackgroundThe functional selection and three-dimensional structural constraints of proteins in nature often relates to the retention of significant sequence similarity between proteins of similar fold and function despite poor sequence identity. Organization of structure-based sequence alignments for distantly related proteins, provides a map of the conserved and critical regions of the protein universe that is useful for the analysis of folding principles, for the evolutionary unification of protein families … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have employed structural entries from the PASS2 database to understand and improve sequence data mining techniques, where the searches are specifically meant for distant homologues 19 . SCOP is a good benchmark dataset to evaluate many homology detection methods 6 , but removing redundancy with respect to similar entries reduces the search time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have employed structural entries from the PASS2 database to understand and improve sequence data mining techniques, where the searches are specifically meant for distant homologues 19 . SCOP is a good benchmark dataset to evaluate many homology detection methods 6 , but removing redundancy with respect to similar entries reduces the search time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PASS2 19 based on the SCOP database and the ASTRAL compendium 20 , uses protein structural entries from the SCOP superfamily with less than 40% mutual sequence identity. Three superfamilies each from four structural classes from the PASS2 database were selected for this study ( Table 1).…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Protein domains in primary structural databases such as PDB (Protein Data Bank) [1] have been grouped according to structural hierarchy such as protein folds, superfamilies and families in databases like CATH (Class, Architecture, Topology, Homologous superfamily) [2] and SCOP (Structural Classification of Proteins) [3]. There are also secondary databases like PASS2 (Protein Alignments organised as Structural Superfamilies) [4-6] which follows the SCOP hierarchy and provide highly accurate structure based sequence alignments for protein domain superfamilies. It is widely accepted that protein domains which cluster under a superfamily generally adopt similar tertiary structure, in spite of having low sequence identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This length changes have been caused by “indels” (insertions/deletions) in protein sequences which has in turn been used to follow updates of secondary databases derived from SCOP. Earlier studies by our group had examined the length variations in 353 multi-membered superfamilies from PASS2.2 database [4], using an objective algorithm called CUSP (Conserved Units of Structures in Proteins) [7], and analysed length variations and its consequences on functionality of protein domains [8]. Such analyses have been helpful to recognise and classify superfamilies into 64 “Length-deviant” (ones which can tolerate large {i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%