2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passivation of the calcite surface with malonate ion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both dicarboxylic acids an increase was observed in the absolute value of the surface charge at pH ∼ = 7.00 compared to other experimental pH values. This is in agreement with the position of the maximum value of the surface charge between the experimental range reported for pure calcite in aqueous solution, which was around pH 7.45 [5].…”
Section: Surface Chargesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For both dicarboxylic acids an increase was observed in the absolute value of the surface charge at pH ∼ = 7.00 compared to other experimental pH values. This is in agreement with the position of the maximum value of the surface charge between the experimental range reported for pure calcite in aqueous solution, which was around pH 7.45 [5].…”
Section: Surface Chargesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We have shown previously [5] the determination of the surface charge of marble powder in aqueous media as a function of pH. The isoelectric point (IP) was found to occur at pH 6.45 and the point of zero charge (PZC) at pH 8.20, which are close values compared to those reported in other works [4,33,36].…”
Section: Isoelectric Point and Point Of Zero Chargesupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ð10 14Þ calcite surface is charge neutral, which assures that there is no significant polarization associated with any of the interfaces (calcite-water, water-vacuum, and calcite-vacuum) created by the slab model (Duckworth et al, 2003). At circumneutral conditions, the calcite surface is approximately neutral with charge separation (van Cappellen et al, 1993;Pokrovsky et al, 1999Pokrovsky et al, , 2000Fenter et al, 2000;Pokrovsky and Schott, 2002;Duckworth et al, 2003;Salinas-Nolasco et al, 2004). Assuming equilibrium conditions for the calcite, protonated surface and solvated metal and bicarbonate species were omitted from the simulation cell.…”
Section: Modeling Simulations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%