2009
DOI: 10.1039/b807545j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive and active single-cell biomechanics: a new perspective in cancer diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, any conditioning of the phagocyte, such as its fixation, which is required, e.g., in aspiration techniques, is not needed. In cancer research, where it has been found that the biomechanical properties of the cytoskeleton of cancer cells defer significantly from those of non-malignant cells (cf., e.g., Brunner et al, 2009, and references therein), an easily applicable, microscopic non-destructive probe for cytoskeletal stress may be of interest not only for basic studies, but also even for initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, any conditioning of the phagocyte, such as its fixation, which is required, e.g., in aspiration techniques, is not needed. In cancer research, where it has been found that the biomechanical properties of the cytoskeleton of cancer cells defer significantly from those of non-malignant cells (cf., e.g., Brunner et al, 2009, and references therein), an easily applicable, microscopic non-destructive probe for cytoskeletal stress may be of interest not only for basic studies, but also even for initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is fundamentally due to several obstacles that might emerge when dealing with complex microstructures characterizing living systems, difficulties essentially arising from the fact that, during the test, intrinsic changes of the biological structure, movements of its mechanical apparatus and biochemical responses can all in principle interfere with the actual property being measured. Furthermore, for example at the single-cell scale, mechanical features may be drastically different from one site to another, as a consequence of reorganization dynamics activated by adhesion, migration and polymerization-depolymerization processes which change the internal configuration of the cytoskeleton and, as a result, may determine non-homogeneous distribution of stiffness and deformation [2,3,52]. In this respect, Lekka et al [31] show, for instance, that depth of indentation, the substrate on which the cells are spread, the load rate as well as the position and time of cell poking might all influence the stiffness atomic force microscopy measurements.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analyses: Qualitative Insights Into and The Resomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All rights reserved. and motility being driven by the assembly ( polymerization) and disassembly (depolymerization) of branched actin filaments [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that the elasticity of mammalian cells is important in cellular processes and signal transductions and it is even a valuable indicator of disease development. [11] In plants, the mechanical properties of the cells also play a key role in the maintenance of plant morphology, growth control, and resistance against pathogens. [12] It has been found that the elasticity of plant cells and tissues is sensitive towards structural changes in the cell walls and the tissues [13] and its change is associated with the cellular response to environmental stresses, including drought, [14] salts, [15] temperature, [16] and trace-metal pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%