2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-00998-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive and grab sampling methods to assess pesticide residues in water. A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive sampling, whereby a material is directly deployed in wastewater to sorb the virus over time, may provide an inexpensive and practical alternative to autosampling ( Valenzuela et al, 2020 ). Liu et al (2020) used a Moore swab (i.e., pieces of gauzes) tied to a fishing line for surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive sampling, whereby a material is directly deployed in wastewater to sorb the virus over time, may provide an inexpensive and practical alternative to autosampling ( Valenzuela et al, 2020 ). Liu et al (2020) used a Moore swab (i.e., pieces of gauzes) tied to a fishing line for surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other disadvantages to traditional detection methods include: 1) challenges of selectivity, wherein common co-existing but benign analytes can provide false positive signals using the pesticide sensor (Bexfield et al, 2020); 2) challenges in applicability for a pesticide life cycle, in which the sensor can detect the pesticide but not its decomposition products (Chen et al, 2019b); and 3) challenges in obtaining rapid results, due to the need for time-consuming separation and purification procedures, which are particularly critical in rapidly changing, real-world environments. Of note, many of these challenges can be addressed using on-site sampling followed by detailed inlaboratory analysis; such a strategy breaks down, however, for highly unstable pesticide and pesticide-related analytes (Valenzuela et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive samplers have been widely employed to measure a large range of contaminants and can offer several advantages compared with traditional grab samples (Barcel o & Ruan, 2019;Greenwood et al, 2007). In site investigation work, passive sampling can reduce the labor costs and health and safety risk associated with sampling, amount of materials shipped for analysis, and investigation-derived waste generated (Valenzuela et al, 2020). Grab sampling provides water quality data at a specific time, but may not be representative of a time weighted average if transient variations in analyte concentration are missed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%