2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.photonics.2018.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive electromagnetic decoupling in an active metasurface of dipoles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider an array formed by three active dipoles and two passive SLRs located as shown in figure 1(a). Let us follow to the logics of our work [11] where the general condition of the decoupling was obtained in terms of the selfand mutual impedances and the geometry of the decoupling scatterers was not specified. For an array of three active dipoles and two passive scatterers we have (see also in figure 1(a)):…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consider an array formed by three active dipoles and two passive SLRs located as shown in figure 1(a). Let us follow to the logics of our work [11] where the general condition of the decoupling was obtained in terms of the selfand mutual impedances and the geometry of the decoupling scatterers was not specified. For an array of three active dipoles and two passive scatterers we have (see also in figure 1(a)):…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering equations (2) and (3), any type of scatterers which satisfies these equations results in the decoupling between all three array elements. In [11], these decoupling conditions were satisfied by two passive dipoles identical to the active dipoles but shortcut at the center. It is possible to prove that replacing these passive dipoles by passive SLRs allows to satisfy these equations as well [12].…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations